Based on your reading from this week, specifically Paid Family Leave NY Times article and the assigned reading from BCG BCG-Why-Paid-Family-Leave-Is-Good-Business-Feb-2017-Revised.pdf What findings were surprising about the consequences of paid family leave in California? What do you think accounts for the surprising findings? Which perspective on paid family leave seems more 'correct' to you (whatever that means); focusing on the costs and benefits to an employee? Or to an employer? Which perspective on balance makes the most sense? What changes would you recommend that would make Paid Family Leave programs more effective? For example, what government or employer policies would ensure that when they (women) return to work they are not penalized in terms of wages and promotion opportunities