Battoni v$.$ IBEW Local Union $102$ Employee Pension Plan What were the legal issues in this case? What did the court decide?$2.$Which two things must be shown by plaintiffs to prove that there has been a violation of ERISA$$s anti$-$cutback rule?$3.$As the anti$-$cutback provisions of ERISA apply only to pensions and not to welfare plans, why did chang$-$ing the conditions under which retiree health$-$care benefits were available run afoul of the anti$-$cutback rule?$4.$In what sense were the accrued pension benefits of these employees reduced?$5.$What should the benefit plan have done instead