Because he is not paying attention, Alex runs over and injures a child on a pedestrian crossing. The child's mother, who is standing nearby, suffers shock and requires medical treatment. Bev, who does not know the child, sees the television report of the accident that night and becomes ill when she sees pictures of the blood on the road.

Did Alex owe the child, its mother and/or Bev a duty of care in tort of negligence? Use

IRAC model to answer the question.