Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Because of the availability of equipment and labor, Clear View has started making mass market picture frames at its Orlando, Florida plant with the excess

Because of the availability of equipment and labor, Clear View has started making mass market picture frames at its Orlando, Florida plant with the excess capacity. Clear View has determined that process costing would be most appropriate for this product. Management wants to know the differences between using the Weighted Average and FIFO methods

Every picture frame passes through two departments: the assembly department and the finishing department. This problem focuses on the assembly department. The process-costing system at Clear View has a single direct-cost category (direct materials) and a single indirect-cost category (conversion costs). Direct materials are added when the assembly department process is 10% complete. Conversion costs are added evenly during the assembly department's process.

Consider the following data for the assembly department in April 2014:

image text in transcribed

Degree of completion: direct materials, 100%; conversion costs, 40%.

Degree of completion: direct materials, 100%; conversion costs, 15%.

Summarize the total assembly department costs for April 2014, and assign them to units completed (and transferred out) and to units in ending work in process using the weighted average method.

What issues should a manager focus on when reviewing the equivalent units calculation?

Summarize the total assembly department costs for April 2014, and assign them to units completed (and transferred out) and to units in ending work in process using the FIFO method.

Explain any difference between the cost of work completed and transferred out and the cost of ending work in process in the assembly department under the weighted-average method and the FIFO method. Should Clear View's managers choose the weighted-average method or the FIFO method? Explain briefly.

I have started the first two parts

Project Part II Section I
Summarize the Flow of Physical Units and Compute Output in Equivalent Units; Weighted-Average Method of Process Costing, Assembly Department of Clear View for April 2014.
Equivalent Units
Physical Direct Conversion
Flow of Production Units Materials Costs
Work in process, beginning 60
Started during current period 510
To account for 570
Completed and transferred out
during current period 450 450 450
Work in process, ending 120 120 18
Accounted for 570
Equivalent units of work done to date 570 468
Direct materials = 570
Conversion costs = 468
Total
Production Direct Conversion
Costs Materials Costs
Work in process, beginning $1,686 $1,530 $156
Costs added in current period 29,394 17,850 11,544
Total costs to account for $31,080 $1,530 $156
Costs incurred to date 29394 $17,850 $11,544
equivalent units of work done 570 468
Cost per equivalent unit 59 $34 $25
Assignment of costs:
Completed and transferred out 26550 15300 11250
Work in process, ending 4,530 4080 450
Total costs accounted for $31,080 $19,380 $11,700
A manager should take into account the following issues, the proper degree of the completion should be taken so that the equivalent cost per unit should not be understated. If the calculation equivalent units is correct then it also helps in stating the correct ending inventory and operating income.
Project Part II Section 2
FIFO Method
Equivalent Units
Physical Direct Conversion
Flow of Production Units Materials Costs
Work in process, beginning 60
Started during current period 510
To account for 570
Completed and transferred out 60 0 36
Started and Completed 390 390 390
Work in process, ending 120 120 18
Accounted for 570
Equivalent units of work done to date 510 444
Total
Production Direct Conversion
Costs Materials Costs
Work in process, beginning $1,686
Costs added in current period 29,394
Total costs to account for $31,080
Costs added in current period 29394 17850 11544
Equivalent Units from row 65 510 444
Cost per Equivalent Unit 61 35 26
Assignment of costs:
Completed and transferred out :
WIP Beginning Inventory
Costs added to Beginning WIP
Total from Beginning Inventory
Started and Completed
Total WIP and Transferred Out
Work in process, ending
Total costs accounted for
The following table summarizes the costs assigned to units completed and those still in process under the weighted-average and FIFO process-costing methods
Weighted Average FIFO Difference
Cost of units completed and transferred out
Work in process, ending
Total costs accounted for
Explain differences

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

ISE Fundamentals Of Cost Accounting

Authors: William N. Lanen, Shannon Anderson, Michael W. Maher

7th Edition

1265117705, 9781265117702

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

LO6 Define harassment and the role that HR plays in addressing it.

Answered: 1 week ago