Becka enters into an investment scheme with some local bigwigs. To get her money, these people lie to Becka about several material facts that are related to the investment scheme. Later, Becka sues to rescind the investment contract on the basis of misrepresentation. At the trial, while Becka is on the witness stand, the attorney for the other parties asked her why she entered into the contract in the first place. She replied, "For one reason and one reason only: I admired these men tremendously and figured that any deal good enough for them was a deal I wanted in on too. The details didn't matter; if they were in it, I wanted to be in it too."

A.Present Becka's argument for misrepresentation. Be sure to list all the elements and how they apply in this case.

B.If you were the attorney for the other side, what is the ONE most important argument that you would make in attacking the argument made by Becka in part "a".