Below are two commentaries based on The Wall Street Journal article "The Instant Message Generation Gap" by Sue Shellenbarger.

Commentary 1:

1) Affect on a Past Work or Internship: During my previous Software Developer Internship at Elakk Technologies which is an IT Technology and Outsourcing company, the impact of instant messaging apps was quite evident in the daily workflow. As my team embraced platforms like Slack, our communication and collaboration underwent a significant shift. Instead of relying solely on emails or in-person discussions, instant messaging became the go-to method for quick updates, sharing code snippets, and seeking assistance. For example, if I encountered an issue while working on a feature, I could instantly reach out to my teammates through Slack. I would send a direct message to a senior developer, describing the problem and attaching relevant code snippets. This allowed for swift troubleshooting and enabled me to receive immediate feedback or guidance, which expedited the development process. The instant nature of the communication helped resolve minor roadblocks efficiently, ensuring smooth progress on the projects I was involved in. In conclusion, the proliferation of instant messaging apps in the workplace significantly impacted my previous Software Developer Internship. It revolutionized how team members communicated, allowing for quicker information exchanges, seamless collaboration, and enhanced problem-solving. While challenges such as managing distractions increased, I learned to adapt and strike a balance between instant messaging and focused coding work.

2) Impact on the Current Work or Internship: In my current job/internship, the impact of instant messaging and the generation gap in communication preferences would be an ongoing factor. As a Software Intern, I would likely be using instant messaging platforms like Slack or Microsoft Teams to communicate with colleagues, stakeholders, and clients. The article highlights the challenges and benefits of instant messaging in the workplace, such as reducing the need for meetings, sustaining conversations, and getting quick answers. For example, when engaging in discussions with team members about a critical bug or a complex software feature, I would strive to maintain clear and concise communication, ensuring that all relevant information is conveyed accurately. While emojis might add a touch of personality to conversations, I would be mindful of using them sparingly and appropriately, especially in professional exchanges. The generation gap in communication preferences could also manifest in my current job or internship. As a Software Intern, I might find myself working alongside colleagues from different age groups, each with their own preferred modes of communication. Some older team members might still prefer traditional email-based communication, while younger colleagues might be more inclined towards instant messaging. Overall, the impact of instant messaging and the generation gap in communication preferences in my current job or internship would require me to be adaptable, communicative, and considerate of the diverse preferences within the team. By finding the right balance between different communication channels and promoting effective collaboration, we can leverage the benefits of instant messaging while ensuring productivity and fostering a cohesive work environment.

3) Affect on a Future Work or Internship: Looking ahead to a future job or internship, the ideas, concepts, and technologies discussed in the article would continue to shape the software development landscape. The increasing adoption of workplace apps that bundle instant messaging with team collaboration tools and web conferencing would likely become more prevalent. It would be essential to adapt to the specific tools and platforms used by the organization to effectively communicate and collaborate with team members, regardless of their age or communication preferences. To illustrate, let's say there is a critical bug that requires immediate attention. Instead of scheduling a meeting or sending lengthy emails, I could quickly reach out to the relevant team members through instant messaging. We could discuss the issue in real-time, share code snippets or error logs, and brainstorm potential solutions. Furthermore, the impact of the generation gap in communication preferences would still be relevant in a future job or internship. As the software development field evolves, new generations of developers with different communication habits and preferences will enter the workforce. In summary, the impact of instant messaging and the generation gap in communication preferences would continue to shape the software development landscape in future jobs or internships. Adapting to specific communication tools, effectively managing notifications, and bridging the gap between different generations would be essential skills. By embracing these changes, staying informed about emerging technologies, and maintaining effective communication practices, I would be well-equipped to thrive in the evolving software development industry.

Commentary 2:

1) Affect on a Past Work or Internship: In the event that the thoughts, concepts, or innovations specified within the article were pertinent to past work or internship, they may have impacted communication designs and efficiency. For illustration, the article talks about the generational hole in communication inclinations, highlighting that more youthful workers tend to depend intensely on moment-informing stages. In the past part, this may have affected the way group individuals collaborated, shared data, and made choices. It might have required adjusting to unused communication devices, altering to distinctive communication styles, and finding viable ways to bridge the gap between distinctive eras within the work environment.

2) Impact on the Current Work or Internship: Within the setting of a current work or internship, the thoughts, concepts, or advances examined within the article could influence communication flow and work forms. For occasion, in the event that moment information is getting to be progressively predominant within the work environment, it might streamline communication, facilitate quick exchanges of data, and upgrade group collaboration. Be that as it may, it may moreover show challenges such as potential diversions, they have to oversee different communication channels, and the significance of setting up clear rules for effective and proficient communication.

3) Affect on a Future Work or Internship: For work or internship approximately to be begun, the thoughts, concepts, or innovations specified within the article seem to shape the nature of communication and work hones. In the event that moment informing is exceedingly esteemed or anticipated within the unused work environment, it would be vital to familiarize oneself with the favored stages and behavior encompassing their utilization. Furthermore, being mindful of generational contrasts and understanding how to successfully communicate and collaborate with colleagues from differing age bunches seem to contribute to a smooth integration into the unused work environment. In rundown, the effect of the thoughts, concepts, and innovations examined in 'The Moment Message Era Gap' would depend on the circumstances of the work or internship. Be that as it may, in common, being versatile, open to modern communication devices, and understanding the inclinations and desires of colleagues from diverse eras can contribute to fruitful proficient encounters in a quickly advancing working environment.

Answer the following Questions:

1) With respect to commentary 2, did the commentary focus on the application of the concepts/frameworks discussed in the readings to current or prior work environment(s) and did they address things from their professional (past, present, future) perspective? Or did they lean in too much to their personal perspectives or opinions on the matter?

2) From commentary 1 perspective, tell if commentary 2 relates to commentary 1. Where do they have a common ground? Where do they disagree?

3) From commentary 1 perspective, tell if commentary 2 changed your perspective in any way. If so, how? If not, why?