1. BigComm Enterprises uses email for routine company correspondence with its employees. BigComm has a policy on the use of the email system which stated among other things that (1) email should be used for company business only; (2) email should be professional and courteous; and (3) email would remain confidential and would not be used as grounds for employment actions such as firing or discipline. Alex Simpson, an employee-at-will with BigComm, sent a series of angry emails to his supervisor. The emails contained threatening language concerning certain physical harms that Alex wanted to do to the supervisor and to several other employees. Later, BigComm retrieved those messages and fired Alex. Alex brought suit, alleging that BigComm should reinstate him because of both the public policy exception (invasion of personal privacy) and the implied contract exception (violation of company policy) to the employment-at-will doctrine. Explain who the court should rule for and why?