Bill Jorgenson is terminally ill. Suppose Bill's son, Harold, convinces his father that Cheryl Jorgenson, Bill's wife and Harold's mother, is initiating institutional commitment proceedings against Bill. In fact, that is not true. Nevertheless, Bill changes his will because of this allegation and leaves everything to Harold. According to your state's law, what are the grounds for contesting a will? Which grounds can Cheryl use to contest Bill's will? What other rights does Cheryl have if the will is declared valid? See the Cook case previously cited