Bo was the owner of Lot No. 1 on which he had built his home. Sadia owned the adjoining Lots No.2 and 3, which were undeveloped, along with Lot No. 4 on which Sadia's home was located. Bo wished to acquire Lot No. 2 in order to protect his home site from crowding if Lot No. 2 should be sold to a stranger.

Meeting Sadia on the street on January 2, Bo explained his wish to acquire Lot No. 2 and offered to buy it from Sadia for $75,000 cash. Sadia agreed and promised to deliver a deed to Lot No. 2 in 4 weeks. Bo paid Sadia $1,000 as a deposit or down payment towards the purchase price of $75,000.

On February 1, Sadia told Bo that she had changed her mind. Bo demands that Sadia perform the contract. Sadia contends that if there is any contract, it is unenforceable.

(a)Was there an offer and acceptance sufficient to constitute a contract between Sadia and Bo?(b)In an action by Bo against Sadia for breach of contract, judgment for whom? Explain

(d) If the contract is not enforceable, may Bo recover his $1,000? Explain.