Boshay decides to go snowmobiling at a snowmobile track owned by Champo. Champo requires that all the snowmobilers sign an agreement containing a release (also referred to as an exculpatory clause) providing that even if the snowmobile track facility or owner is negligent and that negligence results in injury, the snowmobiler agrees not to hold the snowmobile facility or Champo liable. While navigating a steep curve, Boshay lost control of her snowmobile and crashed causing Boshay to suffer a broken spine and both legs were broken. Boshay complains that she was not adequately warned of conditions on the track and sues the facility and Champo . Champo's position is that the release is not enforceable. What is the release Boshay signed called, and discuss what is Champo's best argument? [Read the textbook and review the Slide Presentation. Remember to define the terms and discuss the basic test to determine whether such an agreement is 9:26 enforceable based on the facts in this scenario. Do not discuss what ifs or alternative outcomes. Although you might recognize elements of a tort, do not follow that line of thinking this is strictly an issue involving the law of contracts. Ices