Bridget, a young friend of Mark, wished to borrow a sum of money from a local bank. Mark was quite wealthy but elderly, with very poor eye sight. He frequently requested Bridget to read his newspaper to him when she would drop by for a visit because reading was exceedingly difficult for him. One evening, Bridget placed a paper before Mark and explained to him that she wished to borrow a sum of money but required a letter of reference before the bank would make the loan and requested him to sign the paper. David signed the paper at her request without reading it. Unknown to Mark, the paper was a guarantee of Bridget's indebtedness, and not a letter of reference. Bridget later defaulted on her debt and the bank called Mark looking to exercise his guarantee. Multiple Choice O Mark can have Bridget charged with fraud and this will void his guarantee. O Bridget required Mark's signature on the paper because the Statute of Frauds requires a guarantee to be in writing and signed to be enforceable and Mark may successfully plead non est factum as a defence to any claim by Bridget's creditor. O If Bridget had told Mark that the paper was a guarantee for $5,000 when it was in fact for $10,000, David could successfully plead the guarantee was signed under duress.