Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

00
1 Approved Answer

Brighton Rock Manufacturing Company[1] The background: Graham Hale, Controller of Brighton Rock Manufacturing Company (BRMC), a local machining shop with several computer controlled machine tools,

Brighton Rock Manufacturing Company[1]

The background:

Graham Hale, Controller of Brighton Rock Manufacturing Company (BRMC), a local machining shop with several computer controlled machine tools, was contemplating the pricing for a new order that had just arrived. The customer requested that BRMC submit a bid for the fabrication of 100 units of a complex product that the company had never built before (although it is well within their capabilities and compatible with current products). BRMCs engineers would have to spend time developing the process routines to machine the components required for the product. Hale wondered whether the usual markup of 35% over manufacturing cost would really be adequate for this order.

BRMCs current product costing system:

Materials for the order would cost $12.40 per unit of finished product. The product would require 0.6 direct labor hours and 0.8 machine hours per unit manufactured. The companys direct labor rate is $20 per direct labor hour. Overhead is currently applied to products using two rates: 200% of direct labor dollars (cost), and $70 per machine hour.

Thus the cost per unit of this order would be calculated as follows:

Direct materials $ 12.40

Direct labor 0.6 * $20 12.00

DL based overhead 200% * $12.00 24.00

MH based overhead 0.8 * $70 56.00

Total cost per unit produced $104.40

The total cost of the order would therefore be 100 * $104.40, or $10,440. Adding the 35% markup, BRMC would bid $10,440 * 1.35, or $14,094 for the job. Hales concern is concerned that this bid would not pay for all the engineering effort, and also the selling and administrative expenses, and still leave any actual profit.

What about a different costing system: ABC?

Hale recalls that several months ago a summer intern from performed a simple activity-based study of BRMCs operations as part of a work-study project. Hale searched his files and found the report the student had prepared. He saw that the student had developed the following list of activities, cost drivers, and activity rates.

ACTIVITY

COST DRIVER

ACTIVITY RATE

Process customer orders

Number of customer orders

$100 / order

Provide engineering design and support

Engineering hours

$75 / engineering hour

Purchase and receive components

Number of purchase orders

$150 / purchase order

Schedule production and perform first-item inspections

Number of production runs

$200 / production run

Set up machines

Number of set up hours

$80 / set up hour

Machine processing

Machine hours

$60 / machine hour

Direct labor assembly

Direct labor hours

$50 / DLH

Hale went on to estimate the quantity of each activity cost driver this new order would require.

Activity cost driver

Quantity for 100 units

Number of purchase orders

10

Number of production runs*

6

Setup time per production run

3 hours

Number of customer orders

1

Engineering design and process time

20 hours

* A separate production run would be required to custom machine some of the components before assembly into the final product.

REQUIRED:

Hale speaks of administrative expenses that the bid (using traditional costing) might not be able to cover. What might some of these expenses be? Is their quantity likely to be affected by this order? Explain.

We listed the steps in developing an ABC system as being:

Define activities.

Identify the cost of each activity.

Define a cost driver for each activity.

Calculate an activity (overhead) rate for each activity.

Use the activity rates to assign activity costs to the product.

The table does not show the total cost of each activity. Be certain you understand where the result of steps (a), (c) and (d) are reflected in the table.

Identify each activity in the table as Unit, Batch, or Product level.

Calculate the total cost of the order using activity based overhead application. Dont forget the materials and labor costs. What would the bid to the customer be if BRMC continues to use the 35% mark up?

Explain why the number you obtain is so different from the one Hale obtained using the companys current overhead application rates. Is it better, or just different? Give at least two factors that suggest the company should use activity based costing for its specialty products.

BRIGHTON ROCK MANUFACTURING CO. Notes on Brighton Rock:
Total cost per unit produced: 100 units ordered 1. Remember there are TWO costs of direct labor workers to the company:
Direct materials $12.40 a. DIRECT LABOR: what they PAY the people.
Direct labor 0.6 * $20 12.00 $20 per DLH 0.6 DLH/unit b. Direct labor OVERHEAD SUPPORT - this is the ACTIVITY that is ALLOCATED based
DL based OH 200% * $12 24.00 200% of DL$ on direct labor.
MH based OH 0.8 * $70 56.00 $70 per MH 0.8 MH/unit 2. A BATCH level activity is done ONCE for as many UNITS as you need to process.
Total cost $104.40 It doesn't depend on units, but rather on how many times you do that ACTIVITY.
3. In Question 2, I am asking for a VERY SHORT explanation of how BRMC estimated total cost
Markup 35% of mfg cost and total units of activity, and calculated the activity rate.
Total order cost for 100 units $10,440.00 total cost to produce using TRADITIONAL costing This is a question of UNDERSTANDING. You are given an activity RATE, but not
Total bid @ mfg cost * 1.35 $14,094.00 total bid to customer with 35% markup where (what numbers) the rate came from. Just do ONE rate, not all of them.
4. For Question 1: you are calculating what it will cost BRMC to make this order. Why does
ACTIVITY COST DRIVER ACTIVITY RATE it matter? What other "numbers" (revenues, costs) in the company will that
Process customer orders # of orders $100 per order affect? What WON'T it affect?
Provide engineering design / support Engineering hr $75 per eng hr
Purchase / receive components # of PO's $150 per PO
Schedule production / 1st inspection # of prod runs $200 per prod run
Set up machines # of setup hrs $80 per SU hr
Machine process machine hr $60 per MH
DL assembly DLH $50 per DLH
Cost drivers required by the order:
# of PO's 10
# of production runs 6
SU hr per production run 3
# of customer orders 1
Engineering hr 20
Activity levels:
3. Process customer orders
Provide engineering design / support
Purchase / receive components
Schedule production / 1st inspection
Set up machines
Machine process
DL assembly
4. Cost of the order (total):
Direct labor given
Direct materials given
Overhead: process orders
Engineering design/support
Purchase/receive components
Schedule production
Set up machines
Machine process
DL assembly
Total cost of the order
Cost per unit ( 100)
Add markup of 35% = bid to customer

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Students also viewed these Accounting questions