Bugs wanted to buy a car. As such, he entered into a contract with Elmer. In their negotiation Bugs learned that Elmer is not the registered owner of the subject vehicle. He asked Elmer about this and was told not to worry because Elmer has already secured the consent of the registered owner Yosemite. So, Bugs pushed through with the deal.

However, after a few months, Yosemite filed a complaint to annul the contract of sale between Bugs and Elmer claiming that his (Yosemite) consent was vitiated and he did not intend to sell his car.

a.Is the contract of sale between Bugs and Elmer valid or voidable? Why? Cite a provision to support your answer (5 points)

b. If voidable, can Yosemite file its annulment even if he was not involved in the said contract of sale? (5 points)