Business Law I: Final Exam II--Case 3 3.1 catherine Bosley worked as a television news anchor for WKBN Channel 27 in Youngstown, Ohio. While on vacation with her husband in Florida she participated in a "wet t-shirt" contest, which was videotaped without her consent by DreamGirls, Inc. and licensed to Marvad Corp., which runs a Web site for adult entertainment through a subscription service on the Internet. Marvad used depictions of her in INSTRUCTIONS advertisements to promote the materials and services it markets. Web site searches related to Catherine Bosley in (1) Read the 2004 were the most popular search on the World Wide Web. case. Due to the publicity, she resigned from her position at WKBN. Bosley sought an injunction against the defendants from using (2) Provide a her image in any manner that promotes the sale of their goods paragraph with more than five or services. The defendants contend that an injunction would sentences (ie., in violate their First Amendment rights. [Bosley v. Wildwett.com, the section for 310 F. Supp. 2d 914 (N.D. Ohio)] "Purport") that interprets the theme of the 3.2. Purport: Interpretation (Times Romans Font-10-Point; single case, based on space) concepts learned in Chapters 1, 2, 5, 7, [8], 11, or 20)_ (3) In at least three sentences answer the questions. Make sure you 3.3. Question 1: What legal theory did Bosley rely on to seek the justify your injunction? answers with learned concepts of law. 3.4. Question 2: Would an injunction be in violation of the defendant's First Amendment's rights? 3.5.Question 3: What would be a specific legal term used to describe a violation you may have interpreted to occur in the Bosley's case