Business Law I: Final Exam--Case 2

2.1.

Catherine Bosley worked as a television news anchor for WKBN Channel 27 in Youngstown, Ohio. While on vacation with her husband in Florida she participated in a "wet t-shirt" contest, which was videotaped without her consent by DreamGirls, Inc. and licensed to Marvad Corp., which runs a Web site for adult entertainment through a subscription service on the Internet. Marvad used depictions of her in advertisements to promote the materials and services it markets. Web site searches related to Catherine Bosley in 2004 were the most popular search on the World Wide Web. Due to the publicity, she resigned from her position at WKBN. Bosley sought an injunction against the defendants from using her image in any manner that promotes the sale of their goods or services. The defendants contend that an injunction would violate their First Amendment rights. [Bosley v.Wildwett.com, 310 F. Supp. 2d 914 (N.D. Ohio)]

2.2. Purport (Times Romans Font10 Points; Single space)

2.3. Question 1:What legal theory did Bosley rely on to seek the injunction?

2.4.Question 2:Would an injunction be in violation of the defendant's First Amendment rights?

3.5. Question 3:What would be a specific legal term used to describe a violation you may have interpreted to occur in Bosley's case?