Business Law Question.

C. When the software vendor's bill for the software services arrives at Bluebell, Alex calls up the vendor and explains that Thomas is not an employee of Bluebell and he was not authorized to enter into an agreement on Bluebell's behalf. The vendor states that if Bluebell breaks the contract the vendor will sue Bluebell. Alex rashly says "bring it on" before he has talked the situation over with an attorney. The vendor sues and states that even if Thomas did not have express authority to enter into a contract as Bluebell's agent, Bluebell is still responsible. 1. (3 points) Based upon the facts given, will the vendor or Bluebell win this point? Why - what legal theory and what evidence support your conclusion? 2. (3 points) Does Thomas have individual liability? Why or why not? 3. (4 points) Let us assume that Bluebell loses its case and is ordered to pay the vendor. Does Bluebell have any recourse against anyone else? Who? [Meaning, can