Question
Business Law Question: On August 2018, Alex and Karen, friends who shared their love of healthy foods and nutrition, opened up a health food grocery
Business Law Question:
On August 2018, Alex and Karen, friends who shared their love of healthy foods and nutrition, opened up a health food grocery in Chicago selling organic and environmentally conscious foods and nutritional supplements. Karen had no previous experience in retail, but Alex worked for a long time as a manager at a Whole Foods. Karen provided $100,000 in capital contribution to start, and she and Alex agreed that in lieu of his capital contribution in cash, Alex would run the day-to-day operations, and that they "would be equal partners." The business was popular and profitable, and operated under the name "A&K Health Foods" (A&K). Although Alex and Kare did not have a written partnership agreement, the business was a success, and they shared in the profits and liabilities equally.
From day one, A&K rented the
building that the store was located in. Karen helped throughout the store only
when needed at first, but Alex ran the store operations, including the hiring
and buying. By the end of the first year, both Alex and Karen grew comfortable
in Karen's role as more of a "silent partner," although she and Alex
spoke periodically to discuss the business.
After business turned promising
enough to plan for A&K's longer term business prospects, Alex and Karen wanted
to buy the building they were in. Alex asked the owner of their building, an
elderly gentleman who talked about moving closer to his kids in Florida,
whether he would sell the building to them. Alex asked him several times over a
period of two years, but the owner repeatedly said the building was not for
sale.
One month ago, the building owner
visited the store and said to Alex, "I'm planning to retire and would like
to see if you're still interested in buying the building. You've been such a
good tenants. I'll sell the building below market value if you still want
it." Alex replied, "Yes, but may we have a week to think about
it?"The building owner agreed.
Five days later, Alex texted Karen
the following:
Hey K - I've been doing a lot of
soul searching, and decided that I am withdrawing from our partnership. I will
wind up the partnership's business and send you a check for half your share. I
promise to do this fairly and apologize for telling you this over text.
Karen did not reply.
Without letting Karen know, Alex called
the building owner five minutes after he sent the text to Karen and made an
offer for the building. The building owner accepted, and he and Alex entered
into a contract for the purchase/sale of the building. Four weeks later, Alex took
ownership and title to the building, and two weeks ago, Alex sent to Karen a
check for half the total dissolution distribution and explained everything to Karen
in a letter, in which he included a full accounting of dissolution.
After receiving the check, Karen sent
Alex the following text:
Dude - WHAT?! I got your check, but
I'm not cashing it. I never agreed to end the partnership. Not right that that
you did this without talking to me first! And then purchased OUR building
without me! It is OUR building, so you should the title to the building should
be in OUR partnership. Can you even end the partnership by yourself? What makes
you think you can do that? I paid all the money to start our business, and now
you're gonna throw me over the bus like this? By giving me only half of what's
left?
Alex replied by text:
I am so, so sorry, K. I needed a
change in my life. I loved working with you, but feel like I had to do
something on my own. I enjoyed our partnership, but it is dissolved, and I've
moved on. Please understand and do the same.
Alex then proceeded to operate the
store as "A's Health Foods," with the same employees and selling the
same products.
Karen sues Alex for withdrawing
from the partnership and for breaching his partner duties.
QUESTION:
1.Assume that Alex's withdrawal was not unlawful and that the following are the valuations for winding up:
Liabilities to creditors are $40,000;
Outstanding receivables are $30,000; with $10,000 of this received by the time winding up is completed
Equipment, furniture, fixtures, and stock are $300,000
Losses are $20,000
Karen's capital contribution totaled $100,000, and also loaned the partnership $10,000 interest-free to buy a replacement freezer.
If Alex calculated Karens check correctly, how much was the check Karen received?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started