business law question

Question 1 2 pts One of the advantages of suing in tort as opposed to contract for a products liability action is: In contract actions, the plaintiff must prove that the seller breached a duty of care. In contract actions, the plaintiff must prove that personal injury resulted from the use of defective product. In tort actions, the plaintiff need not have purchased the product. In tort actions, the plaintiff need not prove that the product is defective. Question 2 2 pts If a product is inherently and obviously dangerous (example: power lawnmower): (2 point(s)) The seller has a duty to make it as safe as possible and to warn of all known dangers not generally known. It is considered defective if no warning is provided even though the danger is well known. It does not have to be designed to be as safe as possible as long as a sufficient warning is provided. The seller has a duty to make it as safe as possible. 2 pts