business law question

Question 13 2 pts Paul's wife, relying on a manufacturer's brochure, purchased a combination power tool Due to a defective design and construction, the tool could hurl a piece of wood through the air hitting the user. Paul was so injured and brings an action for his injuries. The retailer and the manufacturer defend on the ground that only the wife who purchased the tool can recover. Which statement best describes the result? Paul wins because privity is not required to recover in tort for injuries resulting from a defective product. Paulloses because the power tool was a gift and thus he is not in privity of contract with the seller. Paulloses because power tools for known to be dangerous and he assumed the risk by using the tool. Paul wins because anytime one is injured by a product he may sue the seller of the goods under a contract theory and recover. Question 14 2 pts Oma Gosch purchased a vacuum cleaner manufactured by PDQ company at the local Shop-Smart Discount Store. The next day, Gosch's roommate, Bart Suave, was properly using the vacuum cleaner at their apartment when it suddenly burst into flames. Suave sustained severe burns as a result. The vacuum cleaner was found to be defective. Suave sues Shop-Smart. Which of the following statements is true? The fact that the vacuum cleaner was seriously defective means that Shop-Smart is strictly liable for Suave's injuries. Suave can only collect against the manufacturer of the vacuum cleaner because it was defective. Suave will lose because he did not purchase the vacuum cleaner and thus lacks privity. Suave can not win a products liability suit against Shop-Smart because it is only the retailer, not the wholesaler nor the manufacturer. Question 13 2 pts Paul's wife, relying on a manufacturer's brochure, purchased a combination power tool Due to a defective design and construction, the tool could hurl a piece of wood through the air hitting the user. Paul was so injured and brings an action for his injuries. The retailer and the manufacturer defend on the ground that only the wife who purchased the tool can recover. Which statement best describes the result? Paul wins because privity is not required to recover in tort for injuries resulting from a defective product. Paulloses because the power tool was a gift and thus he is not in privity of contract with the seller. Paulloses because power tools for known to be dangerous and he assumed the risk by using the tool. Paul wins because anytime one is injured by a product he may sue the seller of the goods under a contract theory and recover. Question 14 2 pts Oma Gosch purchased a vacuum cleaner manufactured by PDQ company at the local Shop-Smart Discount Store. The next day, Gosch's roommate, Bart Suave, was properly using the vacuum cleaner at their apartment when it suddenly burst into flames. Suave sustained severe burns as a result. The vacuum cleaner was found to be defective. Suave sues Shop-Smart. Which of the following statements is true? The fact that the vacuum cleaner was seriously defective means that Shop-Smart is strictly liable for Suave's injuries. Suave can only collect against the manufacturer of the vacuum cleaner because it was defective. Suave will lose because he did not purchase the vacuum cleaner and thus lacks privity. Suave can not win a products liability suit against Shop-Smart because it is only the retailer, not the wholesaler nor the manufacturer