business law questions

Question 4 Information about business corporations is provided online by the Government of Canada. Go to the Corporations Canada page on the Government of Canada website. Not yet Locate and read "Is incorporation right for you?" According to the information contained on this page: answered Marked out of Select one: 1.00 O a. The three categories of individuals who have an interest in the corporation and are entitled to act on its behalf are directors, officers and non-government Remove organizations. flag O b. The benefits of incorporating do not include better access to capital and grants. O c. Documents that a federally incorporated business must file with Corporations Canada include notices of any changes in the board of directors. O d. Federal incorporation means that you can operate your business using your corporate name in all provinces, but not also the territories. Question 5 Ana has read about corporations in the Business Law in Canada textbook. Based on the material in the textbook, all of the statements below are true, except one. Choose the Not yet FALSE statement. answered Marked out of Select one: 1.00 O a. Directors may be held personally liable for taxes which are left unpaid by the corporation. Flag O question b. The shareholders elect directors at the annual meeting of shareholders. O c. Certain decisions, such as a fundamental change in the corporation, require shareholder approval. O d. A bankrupt person can serve as a director as long as the director is an adult and of sound mind.Question 7 Read, in particular, the portion of the judgment in Semeniuk v. Ron's Bobcat Service, 2016 ABPC 231 (CanLll), relating to the calculation of damages, as well as the Not yet conclusion. Thereafter, choose the statement below that is INCORRECT. answered Marked out of Select one: 1.00 O a. The Court held that the Defendant' s conduct was high handed, oppressive, arbitrary and callous. Flag question b. The Court cited case authority for the principle that the burden to show that a plaintiff has failed to take all reasonable steps to mitigate her loss is upon the defendant. O c. The Court cited case authority for the principle that the onus is on a plaintiff to prove her damages on a reasonable preponderante of credible evidence. O d. The Court granted judgment in the Plaintiff' s favour in the amount of $20,892.07. Question 8 A claim can be brought in regards to more than one tort. An example of a case which involved both a claim for nuisance and negligence is Meadows v. Proctor, 2012 ABPC Not yet 360 (CanLll). After reading this case, choose the statement below which is TRUE. answered Marked out of Select one: 1.00 O a. The Court held the Defendants liable for negligence. Flag O question b. Both parties had lawyers act for them at the trial of this matter. O c. The Defendants called three third party witnesses, being a by-law officer, a certified arborist and a security guard. O d. The Court applied the principles from the decision in Doucette v. Parent to this case. Question 9 A friend is considering bringing an occupiers' liability action to the courts in Alberta, after being injured at a waterpark. You know that there is Alberta legislation in effect Not yet which is relevant to this type of action. Based on your research of Alberta's Occupiers' Liability Act: answered Marked out of Select one: 1.00 O a. An occupier' s liability under this Act in respect of a visitor may be extended, restricted, modified or excluded by express agreement or express notice. Flag O question b. An occupier owes a duty to every trespasser on the occupier' s premises to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that the trespasser will be reasonably safe in using the premises. O c. This Act applies to or affects an employer' s liability in respect of the employer' s duties to employees. O d. The Contributory Negligence Act has no application, even where the occupier does not discharge the duty of care owed to the visitor and the visitor suffers damage partly as a result of the fault of the occupier and party as a result of the visitor' s own fault