Question
CableTech Bell Corporation (CTB) operates in the telecommunications industry. CTB has two divisions: the Phone Division and the Cable Service Division. The Phone Division manufactures
CableTech Bell Corporation (CTB) operates in the telecommunications industry. CTB has two divisions: the Phone Division and the Cable Service Division. The Phone Division manufactures telephones in several plants located in the Midwest. The product lines run from relatively inexpensive touch-tone wall and desk phones to expensive, high-quality cellular phones. CTB also operates a cable TV service in Ohio. The Cable Service Division offers three products: a basic package with 25 channels; an enhanced package, which is the basic package plus 15 additional channels and two movie channels; and a premium package, which is the basic package plus 25 additional channels and three movie channels.
The Cable Service Division reported the following activity for the month of March:
Basic | Enhanced | Premium | |||||||
Sales (units) | 50,000 | 500,000 | 300,000 | ||||||
Price per unit | $16 | $30 | $40 | ||||||
Unit costs: | |||||||||
Directly traced | $3 | $5 | $7 | ||||||
Driver traced | $2 | $4 | $6 | ||||||
Allocated | $10 | $13 | $15 |
The unit costs are divided as follows: 70 percent production and 30 percent marketing and customer service. Direct labor cost is the only driver used for tracing. Typically, the division uses only production costs to define unit costs. The preceding unit product cost information was provided at the request of the marketing manager and was the result of a special study.
Bryce Youngers, the president of CTB, is reasonably satisfied with the performance of the Cable Service Division. Marchs performance is fairly typical of what has been happening over the past two years. The Phone Division, however, is another matter. Its overall profit performance has been declining. Two years ago, income before income taxes had been about 25 percent of sales. Marchs dismal performance was also typical for what has been happening this year and is expected to continue unless some action by management is taken to reverse the trend. During March, the Phone Division reported the following results:
Inventories: | |
Materials, March 1 | $23,000 |
Materials, March 31 | 40,000 |
Work in process, March 1 | 130,000 |
Work in process, March 31 | 45,000 |
Finished goods, March 1 | 480,000 |
Finished goods, March 31 | 375,000 |
Costs: | |
Direct labor | $117,000 |
Plant and equipment depreciation | 50,000 |
Materials handling | 85,000 |
Inspections | 60,000 |
Scheduling | 30,000 |
Power | 30,000 |
Plant supervision | 12,000 |
Manufacturing engineering | 21,000 |
Sales commissions | 120,000 |
Salary, sales supervisor | 10,000 |
Supplies | 17,000 |
Warranty work | 40,000 |
Rework | 30,000 |
During March, the Phone Division purchased materials totaling $312,000. There are no significant inventories of supplies (beginning or ending). Supplies are accounted for separately from materials. CTBs Phone Division had sales totaling $1,170,000 for March.
Based on my initial analysis, I am confident that an ABC system will offer significant improvement. For one of our conventional phone plants, I regressed total monthly overhead cost on monthly direct labor cost using the following 15 months of data:
Overhead | Direct Labor Cost | |||||
$360,000 | $110,000 | |||||
300,000 | 100,000 | |||||
350,000 | 90,000 | |||||
400,000 | 100,000 | |||||
320,000 | 90,000 | |||||
380,000 | 100,000 | |||||
300,000 | 90,000 | |||||
280,000 | 90,000 | |||||
340,000 | 95,000 | |||||
410,000 | 115,000 | |||||
375,000 | 100,000 | |||||
360,000 | 85,000 | |||||
340,000 | 85,000 | |||||
330,000 | 90,000 | |||||
300,000 | 80,000 |
The results were revealing. Although direct labor cost appears to be a driver of overhead cost, it really doesnt explain a lot of the variation. I then searched for other driversparticularly non-unit drivers that might offer more insight into overhead cost behavior. Every time a batch is produced, material movement occurs, regardless of the size of the batch. The number of moves seemed like a more logical driver. I was able to gather only 10 months of data for this. (Our information system doesnt provide the number of moves, so I had to build the data set by interviewing production personnel.) This information is provided next:
Materials-Handling Cost | Number of Moves | |||
$80,000 | 1,500 | |||
60,000 | 1,000 | |||
70,000 | 1,250 | |||
72,000 | 1,300 | |||
65,000 | 1,100 | |||
85,000 | 1,700 | |||
67,000 | 1,200 | |||
73,500 | 1,350 | |||
83,000 | 1,400 | |||
84,000 | 1,700 |
The regression results were impressive. There is no question in my mind that the number of moves is a good driver of materials-handling costs. Using the number of moves to assign materials-handling costs to products would likely be better than the cost assignment using direct labor cost. Furthermore, since small batches use the same number of moves as large batches, we have some evidence that we may be overcosting our high-volume products.
I looked at one more overhead activity: inspecting products. We have 15 inspectors who are paid an average of $4,000 per month. Each inspector offers about 160 hours of inspection capacity per month. However, it appears that they actually work only about 80 percent of those hours. The drop in demand we have experienced explains this idle time. I see no evidence of variable cost behavior here. Im not exactly sure how to treat inspection cost, but I think that it is more related to inspection hours than direct labor cost. Some of the other overhead activities seem to be non-unit-level, as well enough, in fact, to be concerned about how we assign costs.
After receiving the memo, Kim was intrigued. She then asked Jacob to use the same phone plant as a pilot for a preliminary ABC analysis. She instructed him to assign all overhead costs to the plants two products (Regular and Deluxe models), using only four activities. The four activities were rework, moving materials, inspecting products, and a general catch-all activity labeled other manufacturing activities. From the special study already performed, she knew that materials handling and inspecting involved significant cost; from production reports, she also knew that the rework activity involved significant cost. If the ABC and unit-based cost assignments did not differ by breaking out these three major activities, then ABC may not matter.
Pursuant to the request, Jacob produced the following cost and driver information:
Activity | Expected Cost | Driver | Activity Capacity | ||||||
Other activities | $2,000,000 | Direct labor dollars | $1,250,000 | ||||||
Moving materials | 900,000 | Number of moves | 18,000 | ||||||
Inspecting | 720,000 | Inspection hours | 24,000 | ||||||
Reworking | 380,000 | Rework hours | 3,800 | ||||||
Total overhead cost | $4,000,000 | ||||||||
Expected activity demands:
Regular Model | Deluxe Model | |||||
Units completed | 100,000 | 40,000 | ||||
Direct labor dollars | $875,000 | $375,000 | ||||
Number of moves | 7,200 | 10,800 | ||||
Inspection hours | 6,000 | 18,000 | ||||
Rework hours | 1,900 | 1,900 |
|
Prepare an income statement for the Cable Service Division for March.
Cable Service Division | |
Income Statement | |
For the Month of March | |
Sales revenue | $fill in the blank 5aafee01aff8fd7_2 |
Cost of services sold | fill in the blank 5aafee01aff8fd7_4 |
Gross margin | $fill in the blank 5aafee01aff8fd7_6 |
Less: Operating expenses | fill in the blank 5aafee01aff8fd7_8 |
Income before income taxes | $fill in the blank 5aafee01aff8fd7_10 |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started