Cal, an officer in the United States Army, has grown disgruntled with the competency of his superior officers. When he learned that his unit was about to be deployed to a potentially hostile country he applied for conscientious objector ("CO") status on the grounds that as a member of a traditionally pacifist religious group, he would not be able fulfill his duties as an officer in a combat situation. Cal has never professed any religious beliefs and had often been heard denigrating religious persons. After reading an online article about the history of conscientious objectors in the U.S. Military he moved ahead with his CO application. May Cal's conscientious objector application be constitutionally denied? Group of answer choices Yes, because the First Amendment Establishment Clause allows the government to decide if a person's asserted rights to Free Exercise are consistent with practices of other religious traditions found in the United States. Yes, because protected religious Exercise under the First Amendment extends to sincerely held religious beliefs. No, because the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause forbids the government from regulating or restricting Cal's religious practices in all circumstances. No, because protected religious Exercises under the First Amendment extend to any religious beliefs even if they are contrived