Cal-Ban 2010 is a weight loss drug made by We Care Products, Inc., a Florida corporation, and marketed through RSA Industries, another Florida corporation. Entioed by ads for Cal-Ban that she saw on social media, Dan Tucker's wife bought the drug at Preston's Pharmacies, Inc., in Murfreesboro, Tennessee for her husband. Within a week, Tucker suffered a ruptured colon. Alleging that the injury was caused by Cal-Ban, Tucker sued Preston's Pharmacies, RSA, and We Care Products in a Tennessee state court. RSAand We Care argued that Tennessee did not have personal jurisdiction over them because RSA and We Care were Florida corporations. Also, they argued that if Tennessee did have personal jurisdiction, the appropriate court was the federal district court. Question 1 (5 points) , If the court that is resolving the issue of jurisdiction applies the sliding scale 12 standard, which of the following is the most likely result? 0 The court will determine that jurisdiction is proper because substantial business was conducted over the website. 0 The court will determine that jurisdiction is not proper because the level of online interactivity is not sufficient to satisfy the standard. O The court will determine that jurisdiction is not proper because the social media ad was passive. O The court will determine that jurisdiction is proper because social media was used to attract the purchaser. Question 2 (5 points) Which of the following is the best statement of the general legal rule that is used by courts to resolve the issue of personal jurisdiction over a defendant from another country or state? 0 Astaie court has amhoriiy over cases involving questions of state law 0 Acourt can exercise jurisdiction over property that is located within its boundaries. Adefendant must have minimum contacts With a state in order for a mud to conclude that H is 0 fair to exercise authorrly over the defendant