Can I get help this two questions

Present value of net cash flow total Amount to be invested Net present value $ 5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). Round to two decimal places. Select the proposal to compute present value index. Proposal Tango Proposal Victor Present value index (rounded) 6. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present values of net cash flows computed in part (4). Rank 1st Proposal Tango Rank 2nd Proposal Victor 7. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present value indexes computed in part (5). Rank 1st Proposal Victor Rank and Proposal Tango 8. Based on your calculations above, complete the statements below. Looking at the present value computations, Proposal Tango has the larger net present value. Proposal Victor is attractive in terms of amount of present value per dollar invested. Comparing the two proposals, their present value indices have a moderate range Lastly, Proposal Tango has the larger initial investment. Considering all this information, Kopecky should proceed with Proposal Victor0.747 0.621 0.567 0.497 0.402 6 0.705 0.564 0.507 0.432 0.335 0.665 0.513 0.452 0.376 0.279 8 0.627 0.467 0.404 0.327 0.233 9 0.592 0.424 0.361 0.284 0.194 10 0.558 0.386 0.322 0.247 0.162 Each product requires an investment of $185,000. A rate of 6% has been selected for the net present value analysis. Required: la. Compute the cash payback period for each project. Cash Payback Period Canadian Cycling 2 years v European Hiking 2 years 1b. Compute the net present value. Use the present value of $1 table presented above. If required, use the minus sign to indicate a negative net present value. Canadian Cycling European Hiking Present value of net cash flow total $ Amount to be invested Net present value S3. Using the results from parts (1) and (2) determine which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. Accept / Reject Proposal Sierra Reject Proposal Tango Accept for further analysis Proposal Uniform Reject Proposal Victor Accept for further analysis 4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 12% and the present value of $1 table above. If required, use the minus sign to indicate a subtraction or negative net present value. Select the proposal accepted for further analysis. Proposal Tango Proposal Victor Present value of net cash flow total Amount to be invested $ Net present value 5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). Round to two decimal places. Proposal Tango Proposal Victor Select the proposal to compute present value index. Present value index (rounded)The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 20% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals. Required: 1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals. Assume that net cash flows are uniform throughout the year. Cash Payback Period Proposal Sierra 3 years 8 months Proposal Tango unable to determine Proposal Uniform 3 years 2 months Proposal Victor 2 years 8 months 2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. Round to one decimal place. Average Rate of Return Proposal Sierra Proposal Tango Proposal Uniform Proposal Victor 3. Using the results from parts (1) and (2) determine which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. Accept / RejectPresent Value of $1 at Compound Interest Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20% 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833 2 0.890 0.826 0.797 0.756 0.694 3 0.840 0.751 0.712 0.658 0.579 4 0.792 0.683 0.636 0.572 0.482 5 0.747 0.621 0.567 0.497 0.402 6 0.705 0.564 0.507 0.432 0.335 0.665 0.513 0.452 0.376 0.279 8 0.627 0.467 0.404 0.327 0.233 9 0.592 0.424 0. 361 0.284 0.194 10 0.558 0.386 0.322 0.247 0.162 The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 209% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals. Required: 1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals. Assume that net cash flows are uniform throughout the year, Payback PeriodCapital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Project Sierra Tango Name Uniform Victor Investment $806,674 Investment $2,625,030 Investment $1,425,015 Investment $1,066,680 Income Income Income Net Cash Income Net Cash Net Cash Net Cash from from from from Year Flows Flows Flows Flows Operations Operations Operations Operations $66,000 $220,000 $270,000 $900,000 $207,000 $450,000 $108,000 $400,000 N 66,500 220,000 270,275 900,000 207,000 450,000 108,000 400,000 3 67,000 220,000 270,550 900,000 207,000 450,000 108,000 400,000 67,500 220,000 270,825 900,000 207,000 450,000 108,000 400,000 68,000 220,000 271,100 900,000 207,000 450,000 108,000 400,000 Total $335,000 $1,100,000 $1,352,750 $4,500,000 $1,035,000 $2,250,000 $540,000 $2,000,000 Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20% 1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833McMorris Publications Inc. is considering two new magazine products. The estimated net cash flows from each product are as follows; Year Canadian Cycling European Hiking $102,000 $85,000 83,000 100,000 72,000 68,000 65,000 48,000 20,000 41,000 Total $342,000 $342,000 Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20% 1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833 2 0.890 0.826 0.797 0.756 0.694 3 0. 840 0.751 0.712 0.658 0.579 4 0.792 0. 683 0.636 0.572 0.482 0.747 0.621 0 567 0.497 0.402 6 0.705 0.564 0.507 0.432 0.3 35 0.665 10.513 0.452 O. B76 0.279 0.627 0.467 0.404 0.B27 0.233 0.592 0.424 0. 361 0 284 0.194