Can I please get some help using the sources and the instructions below to do this assignment.

This assignment is worth 15 percent of the total research paper grade (30 points).

Submit an outline of your paper. It should state your working thesis and outline the main point and sub-points of each body paragraph.

Example: the example does not mean stop at just 1 main point with just 2 supporting details.

I. Main point #1

a. Supporting Detail #1

i. Specific piece of evidence (cite this)

1. Any fine points/notes to self

ii. Specific piece of evidence (cite this)

b. Supporting Detail #2

i. Specific piece of evidence (cite this)

ii. Specific piece of evidence (cite this)

(Please see the Resources area on the course site for an outline template and a sample version of an outline.)

This assignment is worth 15 percent of the total research paper grade (30 points).

Source 1:

FindLaw's publication "Antitrust Case Against IBM: History, Chronology, and Legal Issues" thoroughly explains the legal problems involved in the antitrust action against IBM. It covers the case's history, significant dates, and applied legal theories. Additionally, it discusses the pertinent legal concerns, including the application of market dominance and the concept of monopoly power. The piece also looks at how the case might affect other companies and how antitrust law is currently structured.

Source 2:

The Harvard Law Review's "The Antitrust Case Against IBM: An analysis," written by legal professionals, provides a thorough study of the antitrust case against IBM. The case's consequences for upcoming antitrust legislation and supporting documentation. It also offers a thorough analysis of how the case affected IBM and the market as a whole.

Source 3:

The Wall Street Journal Article "A history of the Antitrust Case Against IBM" gives a thorough overview of the antitrust lawsuit brought against IBM. The article discusses the case's background, the relevant legal theories, and the effect the case had on the marketplace. It also looks at how the lawsuit might affect other companies and antitrust legislation stands right now.

Source 4:

The New York Times reported about the antitrust case against IBM in this source on January 17, 1969. It says that the Justice Department brought the lawsuit on behalf of the US government, which charged IBM with engaging in anti-competitive actions in the computer sector. The government charged IBM with utilizing predatory pricing strategies, grouping its products together, and trying to keep rivals out of the market. According to the story, the government was requesting an order that would compel IBM to alter its corporate structure.

Source 5:

This source is the book a Few Good Men from IBM: The Development of the Standard Business Language by David E. Lundstrom. It gives a comprehensive description of the antitrust lawsuit against IBM and the defense put forth by the business. According to Lundstrom, IBM originally refuted the charges but ultimately opted to reach a settlement outside of court. He also talks about the significance of the case, nothing that it was the Justice Department's first attempt to bring an antitrust case against a significant firm. In addition, Lundstrom contends that the lawsuit marked a significant turning point in the computer industry by compelling IBM to alter its business procedures and opening the door for rivals to enter the markets.

References:

Findlaw Attorney Writers, (March 26, 2008), Recent Cases Reveal Gaps in Draft Antitrust/IP Guidelines, https://corporate.findlaw.com/business-operations/recent-cases-reveal-gaps-in-draft-antitrust-ip-guidelines.html

Lundstrom, D. E. (1987). A few good men from Univac. https://tcm.computerhistory.org/exhibits/FewGoodMen.pdf

Time, N. Y. (1972, October 17). BREAKUP OF I.B.M. IS THE ANTITRUST GOAL. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1972/10/17/archieves/breakup-of-ibm-is-antitrust-goal.html

Rosenbush S, (Feb 27, 2022), What Should We Do With the Big Technology Companies?

The Harvard Law Review's "The Antitrust Case Against IBM, (June 10, 2020)Antitrust Federalism, Preemption, and Judge-Made Law, https://harvardlawreview.org/2020/06/antitrust-federalism-p