can my legal memorandum be revised?

This memorandum describes evidence obtain by the Select Subcommittee on the Corona Virus emergency protocols in its investigation into Textiles Inc. The Select Subcommittee initiated this investigation in January 2021 after multiple public reporting's indicated that Textiles Inc. administration forsook employs rights and enforced virus vaccination among all employees. Textiles Inc. indicated that in order to work in the company the employee had to be vaccinated or gat tested every week if they worked in a department that had 150 pus employees. Under the 14th amendment in the United States Constitution its states that no state can deprive any US citizen "Life, Liberty, Property" without due process. United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 554 (1875) reflects the disagreement if any intrusion from the States against any US Citizen from their fundamental rights. Did Textile Inc violate the employee's 14th amendment right? Can the Textile Inc administration prove to have the right to enforce mandatory vaccination or weekly testing for all employees under times of worldwide crisis? The standard or review is crucial. The argument of employees and their "fundamental right" to refuse vaccination seems to have a strong argument. As a result, any intraframe of those "fundamental rights" must be judge under rational basis review. The pandemic made and is still making impact all over the world. The impact is similar to the impact the smallpox epidemic caused. The district court up heled a smallpox vaccine mandate over a century ago9 "Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)" In addition Textiles Inc is giving the option to the employee to do weekly test that show where the employee test negative or positive. Let's also add that this is only enforced in the emp0loyee works in a department that holds 150 plus employees. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1070 was passed to prevent any worker to get harmed or killed and work. This act can also be liked in how Textiles Inc is only seeking for a safer workplace for its employees. No, Textile Inc did not violate employee's amendment. Textile Inc provided employees with an alternative if they refused vaccination. Employees can look for another department that has less that 150n employees, look for another job or simply take a weekly test. OSAH can also be used to present that the interest of the corporation where to improve working conditions for the employees. Evidence show and indicate that the employees that refuse vaccination not only harm themselves. Refusing vaccination and adequate protocol safety procedures can risk and kill many individuals that did not consent to such trade