Can someone help me complete this for The Coca-Cola Company and Pepsi? I'm not sure where to find information about their financial plans etc.

For this assignment, apply the next three steps of the nine-step assessment process detailed in Assessing a Company's Future Financial Health (i.e., Step 5: External Financing Need, Step 6: Target Sources of Finance, and Step 7: Viability of 3-5 Year Plan) to compose further assessment of the company/competitor pairing analysis as below: 1. Current financial plan. Interpret current equity valuations in order to recommend strategic solutions regarding future financial goals. Consider how stock splits and stock dividend allocations can impact the plan. 2. Future external financing needs. To support growth, companies need capital, and external financial needs are vital any firm's future success. Describe external financing needs sufficient to support your ongoing analytical assumptions and pro forma financial statements for your chosen company and competitor. 3. Access to target sources of external financing. You will need to consider the amount of financing, timing, length of time required, and deferability of financing options. 4. Viability of a 3-5 Year Plan. Assess the consistency of the plan with the firm's goals, and the achievability of both the operating plan and the financing plan you are proposing. 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% 70.0 %Content 70.0 % The required set Incorporation of assessment of the elements and Required Set subsection data of Assessment is not present. Elements and Subsection Data 20.0 %Organization & Effectiveness 3 Satisfactory 79.00% The required set of assessment elements and subsection data is incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% The required set of assessment elements and subsection data is incorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. The required set The required of assessment set of elements and assessment subsection data elements and is present, and is subsection incorporated in data is full. The present and submission comprehensiv encompasses e. The essential details submission and provides further appropriate incorporates support. analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. 8.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is Thesis is apparent insufficiently and appropriate to developed or purpose. vague. Purpose is not clear. 7.0 % Argument Logic and Construction Statement of Sufficient purpose is not justification of justified by the claims is lacking. conclusion. The Argument lacks conclusion does consistent unity. not support the There are claim made. obvious flaws in Argument is the logic. Some incoherent and sources have uses noncredible questionable sources. credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. 5.0 % Surface errors Frequent and Some mechanical Mechanics of are pervasive repetitive errors or typos are Writing enough that mechanical present, but they (includes they impede errors distract are not overly spelling, communication the reader. distracting to the punctuation, of meaning. Inconsistencies reader. Correct and grammar, Inappropriate in language varied sentence language use) word choice or choice (register) structure and sentence or word choice audienceconstruction is are present. appropriate used. Sentence language are structure is employed. correct but not varied. 10.0 %Format 5.0 % Paper Template is not Appropriate Appropriate Format (use of used template is used, template is used. appropriate appropriately or but some Formatting is style for the documentation elements are correct, although major and format is rarely missing or some minor errors assignment) followed mistaken. A lack may be present. correctly. of control with formatting is apparent. 5.0 % Sources are not Documentation Sources are Documentatio documented. of sources is documented, as n of Sources inconsistent or appropriate to (citations, incorrect, as assignment and footnotes, appropriate to style, although references, assignment and some formatting bibliography, style, with errors may be etc., as numerous present. appropriate to formatting errors. Thesis is clear Thesis is and forecasts comprehensiv the development e and of the paper. contains the Thesis is essence of descriptive and the paper. reflective of the Thesis arguments and statement appropriate to makes the the purpose. purpose of the paper clear. Argument shows Clear and logical convincing progressions. argument Techniques of that presents argumentation a persuasive are evident. claim in a There is a distinctive smooth and progression of compelling claims from manner. All introduction to sources are conclusion. Most authoritative. sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Appropriate All format template is fully elements are used. There are correct. virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are Sources are documented, as completely appropriate to and correctly assignment and documented, style, and format as is mostly correct. appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free assignment and style) 100 % Total Weightage of error