Can someone help spot the issues with this?

On the evening of February 26, 2012, 17-year-old Treyvon Martin was walking home after picking up some snacks at a local convenience store. George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer with a documented record of regularly reporting potential criminal activity in the area, spotted Martin and deemed the Black, hoodie-clad teenager suspicious. Little is known about what exactly happened next. The 911 dispatcher instructed Zimmerman to stop following Martin. After the call ended, there was a violent encounter between the two that culminated Zimmerman fatally shooting the 17-year-old. Following a public outcry, Zimmerman was charged with Martin's murder. With many claiming the shooting was motivated by racism, and others standing by Zimmerman's claim of self-defense, everyone in the nation was on edge as the trial unfolded in the state court of Seminole County, Florida. Following three weeks of testimony and a litany of expert witnesses for both the prosecution and the defense, the judge in the case reminded the jury of the relevant portion of the law of self-defense in Florida (section 776.012 of the state statutes), which reads, "A person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if: He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself." Following the judge's instructions, the jury deliberated for sixteen hours over the course of two days before it rendered a not guilty verdict. Trayvon Martin's family filed a civil lawsuit (for "wrongful death") against the Homeowners Association of the Florida Subdivisions, where Zimmerman shot Martin. The lawsuit settled for an undisclosed amount after the family (represented by celebrity civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump) reportedly rejected a previous $1 million offer