Can someone please help me answer these?:

A. What types of actions would Kant admit as moral?

a) Lying to a friend to get a loan

b) Lying to a friend to make her happy

c) Lying to a friend because it's easier than explaining the truth

d) None of the above

B. The 'Virginia School' version of public choice theory argues that actions of voters,

legislators and executive officials are motivated by:

a) Common good

b) Morals

c) Self interest

d) Communitarian values

C. Which of the following is included in the thin version of the Rule of Law concept?

a) Market economy

b) Minimum welfare

c) Democratic governance

d) None of the above

D. The power to interpret the Constitution of Australia rests with:

a) The Supreme Court

b) The High Court

c) The Privy Council

d) The Government

E. Providing wheel chair access to university students is an example of:

a) Substantive equality

b) Constitutional equality

c) Formal equality

d) Rule of law

F. In Mabo v Queensland (No.2) 175 CLR 1 the High Court described the application

of the doctrine of terra nullius to Australia as:

a) Racist

b) False in fact

c) Lawful

d) Conquest

G. Which of the following fundamental rights, while not specifically mentioned in the

Constitution, was found by the High Court to be implied in its language and structure?

a) Freedom of political debate

b) Freedom of religion

c) Freedom of same sex marriage

d) Protection of property