Can you apply this normalization rules for the ER diagram?

- 1NF (First Normal Form) - 2NF (Second Normal Form) - 3NF (Third Noferferferfewrmal Form)

- BCNF (Boyce-Codd Normal Form)

Normalization Samples (Just samples nothing related my ER Diagram!!!)

Customer H -- Purchase Made by Customer Phone Country Fname Lname pincode district Street street_code street_name city + Product ProductD type price product price detail prouct_deatils name product_name # made by 1 Payment -payment for Paymento amount data payment_amount which gives Raw materials Fmnlovee emp_nam Raw Materials price raw_price name raw_details raw_name available_quantit Profit --manages by... -- emanaged by .. ProftID Date Profit_amount phone start_date countrycode city pincode streetcode streetname country IV.II. Normalization INF is suitable for our system. Because all attributes in atomic form. 2NF is suitable for our system. Because relations in Inf and every non-prime attributes fully depend on prime attributes. 3NF is suitable for our system. Because the relations in 2nf and all non-prime attributes directly dependent on prime attributes. There is no transitively dependence. III.II.II Normalization The tables resulting from addition process surprisingly have no redundancy. All entities are in BCNF. In 'Stock' entity ID' is primary key and it defines all other attributes also none of the nonkey attributes depend each other The others are as this. Table FDs Stocks ID name, price, quantity Stock units ID unit Stores ID name, address, telephone Employees ID name ID=position Employee position Collection ID=date, quantity Collection ID=type type Customer ID=name, address, telephone, fax, debt, email Orders ID=time, quantity, total, price, note Order type ID-type