Can you edit the following post. According to the primary source, the writings of Anne R. Davidow, the Michigan law prohibiting women from working as bartenders in cities with populations over 50,000 was unconstitutional. Davidow, who was defending her clients Valentine and Margret Goesaert in the court case Goesaert v. Cleary, argued that this law "will deprive plaintiffs of their property without due process of law" and "discriminates against women owners. It discriminates against women bartenders. It discriminates between daughters of male and female owners. It discriminates between waitresses and female bartenders" (Davidow). In Davidow's view, these provisions violated the 14th Amendment. The attitudes behind this law were heavily influenced by beliefs about inherent differences between men and women. The source notes that in the post-war period, "many peoples' attitudes toward women were that women should focus on domesticity and their roles as mothers and wives" (DuBois, 734). There was a widespread belief that "women were biologically more equipped to be mothers and wives and it was their natural role. Whereas, men were more biologically suited to be breadwinners" (DuBois, 745). Some even went so far as to claim that "working moms could harm their children" (DuBois, 745). These ideas about women's natural inclination and suitability for domestic, homemaking roles were used to justify discriminatory laws like the one limiting their employment opportunities as bartender