can you explain and give examples on the tension described in Stephen Hopgood's Keepers of the Flame between human rights advocacy understood as "apolitical" humanitarianism and such advocacy understood as a political campaign for social justice. be as detail as possible

See this summary of Hopgood's own argument: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/amnesty_morality_3625jsp/

Reference: https://human-rights-advocacy.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/2/9/132925744/hopgood_keepers_ch.1-4.pdf