can you explain your answer?

Evaluating cash flows with the NPY method The net present valve (wipy) rule is considered onn of the most common and preferred criteria that genierally lead to good investrment decitions. Consider this case: investrinent of $3,000,000. The project is expected to generate the following net cash flows: Lumbering Oc Truckmakers's weighted average cost of capital is Bwe and project feta hav the tame fith as the firm' averace project. Based on the cash flows, what is prolect Beta's fiov? +11,078,216 51,366,769 51,158,231 51,537,231 Making the accept or reject decision cash flows. what is project Beta's NPV? 51,878,216$1,366,76911,1511,27131,633,231 Making the accopt or reject decision method, it should project fieta. Suppose your bos amount, and the h infiows of Frolect a is larger than the sum of cash inflows of peplect \&. A coworker fold you that you don't need to do an NPY analysis of th because you already know that project A will have a larper. NPy than project b. Do you agree with your coworkir statentient? tumbering Ou Truckmahers's aeighted average cost of capital is 6\%, and project Beta fus the same riak as the fitm's average project. Based on the cash fown, what is project Beta's Nion? $1,978,216$1,366,76911,155,23111,639,231 Making the accept or reject decision Lumbering Ox Trudimakers's decielon to accept or folect preject Beta is independent of its decisions on other peolects. if the firm follons the Nip method it thould project Dete. Guppose your boss has asked rou ta analrce twe mutiwally exclusive projects-project A atd brofect B. Both projects requite the same iavestenent. amount, and the sum of cash inflows of hroject A is larger than the sum of cath lellows of project B, A conorier told you that you idonit need to do an Wey analnits of the prolects because you already inow that project a will have a farger lipy than project B. Do you agree nith your conorker's statement? No, the Novicalculatien ha based en percentage retums, so the slre of a profectis cach flom does not affect a profects fapv. res, preject A will aways have the laroest wox, because its cash irflows are oreater than project bir cash inflowi. No, the Nov calculation wil take into account not oely the prejects' cash lnflaws but alsa the timing of cash inflems and outfigws. Consequentiy. project 0 ceuld hawe a laver for than project A, cven theugh prefect a has larger cath inflows