Can you help me revise my paper and do in text citation

Should there be no cost for students to attend college, as there currently is?

A competitive employment market and financial security demand expertise. Increases college value. Due to rising tuition, many students cannot afford college. Rising college tuition has strained households for decades. College expenditures are examined. College debt and inequity must end.

All families and students fear rising college costs. Education is tougher to afford when tuition rises faster than inflation. In 2021, four-year public university in-state students paid $10,560 and out-of-state $27,020. The average four-year private university degree costs $37,650.

High tuition and other expenditures put many graduates in debt. The average US student loan is $30,000. Many high schoolers cannot afford housing or food, prohibiting them from studying or working.

College procedures must change as tuition and debt climb. College can be free. Student expenditure falls with equality.

FREE but difficult higher education. Lost work, implementation costs, and savings are issues. Debt-free college for all can solve these challenges.

Everyone should have free college. Better education, less debt. Free higher education promotes social fairness despite obstacles.

Cost and college access

US universities are expensive and inaccessible. This comprises public and private entities. College costs are rising faster than inflation, affecting students. In 2021, four-year public university in-state students paid $10,560 and out-of-state $27,020. The average four-year private university degree costs $37,650. High tuition and fees leave most graduates with $30,000+ loans.

High tuition makes college difficult for impoverished students. Even with subsidies, many cannot afford school. Student loans may prevent graduates from working. Low-income families enroll less in college, generating inequity.

Lack of K-12 preparation, college counseling, and race, ethnicity, gender, and other biases harm higher education. Though other factors limit access, money matters. These hurdles make college attendance and success difficult for many students.

US universities are expensive and inaccessible. College costs rise. Scholarships and grants do not increase enrollment. Due to tuition and fees, many students cannot afford college. We must provide higher education to all students regardless of socioeconomic background or other barriers to success to make society fairer and just. Needed social justice.

According to officials.

The Journal of Higher Education reported more need-based aid graduates. Comparing aided and unaided students. Dynarski (2015) found need-based financial aid increased six-year graduation rates 11%.

Another Educational Board investigation indicated unmet educational expenditures for low-income Pell Grant recipients. According to the College Board (2018), the average low-income Pell Grant student had $4,410 in unmet needs at a public four-year college and $15,000 at a private one in 2016-2017.

IHEP thinks tuition-free college may boost enrollment and graduation, especially for low-income students. Kleinman & Maramba (2020) found that eliminating tuition and fees at public colleges and universities may boost enrolment by 22% and graduation rates by 9%.

Many countries offer free college education in addition to these courses. Norway, Finland, Germany. Gonzlez (2016) claims these nations have increased student enrollment and performance, particularly for low-income pupils.

We support college freedom for everybody. Need-based aid helps education but not access. Free college may increase enrolment and graduation, especially for low-income students.

Student debt impacts society and economy:

Student debts harm society and economy. Student loans limit equality and mobility. Student debt may impact parenting and homebuying. Heavy debt may reduce consumer spending, damaging the economy.

Student loans impoverish minorities. After controlling wealth and education, black households fail and have more student debt than white households (Houle & Berger, 2017). However, black households have the most college debt. This can impoverish generations and limit social mobility.

High student debt may hurt the economy. Student loan debt reduces savings and investment, cooling the economy. Student loans may lower GDP and consumption. According to the Roosevelt Institute, eliminating student debt may boost economic growth by $108 billion (around $330 per US person) and create 1.5 million jobs (Goldrick-Rab et al., 2018).

Student loans affect society. Sociology suggests low-income and minority people have less economic mobility and inequality. Product demand and economic growth may collapse. Social and economic solutions are needed for student debt.

Rebuttal that frees higher education is impractical or expensive

Free colleges are attractive but unsustainable. Implementation costs matter. Without funds, free college may be unattainable. Soon, materials may appear.

Free college may increase revenue but cut social services. This is their claim. Free colleges may lower quality and resources.

Abusing free higher education by not contributing to society or the economy is another issue. Free higher education may create a culture of entitlement where individuals think they deserve it without working.

Free college is tempting but problematic. Policymakers should evaluate free college's cost-benefit and find cheaper, more sustainable higher education.

No family or income counts with free college.

Free higher education would give all students equal opportunities, regardless of income or experience. College is expensive for low-income students. Unpaid college teaches equally.

College enrollment is lower for low-income students, say experts. Because college is too expensive for many families. Modest-income students must choose housing, healthcare, or college.

All socioeconomic categories would have no student debt with free college. This will allow all students to pursue academic and vocational goals without financial constraints. This gives students equal chances.

Free college boosts wealth, education, and social mobility. We can level the playing field and accelerate socioeconomic growth by giving all kids higher education, regardless of family income.

Free college would educate all income levels. This applies to rich and poor kids. Tuition is free for all.

Counterarguments include grade inflation and falling standards.

One argument against free higher education is that it could degrade academic standards and raise grades. Cheaper, simpler education may not help. Academic standards and marks can be changed to pass all pupils.

Grade inflation and intellectual decline are unaffected by college expenditures. Few signs suggest unprepared college students will rule higher education. Researchers say free college may prepare more individuals. Students get aid.

Free higher education may be unsustainable or expensive. Critics say free higher education is expensive and requires big government spending.

Free college is cheaper overall, studies show. Higher education increases GDP, inequality, and well-being. German and Swedish free higher education improves growth and education.

False GPA inflation and implementation costs overlook debt reduction and learning equity. Thus, free college is unattainable. Free universities boost education, prosperity, and economy.

Free college cuts graduate and social debt.

College debt may decrease without loans. The average US student graduates with $30,000, while the Federal Reserve recorded an all-time high of $1.7 trillion in student debt (around $5,200 per person) (Monga, 2021). Most students can't repay this loan, jeopardizing their future.

Graduates of free colleges graduate without loans. Without student loans, graduates can buy a home, business, or retire. Consumer spending and growth boost the economy.

Free college students work. Passion and curiosity can steer college-free kids' careers, not money. Better data aids student selection. Social welfare may benefit from worker happiness and engagement.

Free higher education would cost the government too much, say critics. Free higher education is possible with wealth taxation or government aid. Studies suggest that free college education's long-term benefitshigher earnings and economic growthoutweigh its short-term costs.

Graduates and society benefit from free college. Without financial pressure, students can pursue hobbies and careers, making workers happier and more engaged. Despite cost and environmental impact, the effort benefits society.

According to officials.

College Access and Success reported $37,584 2020 graduate debt. Studies reveal 62% of graduates owe. Student debt may prohibit graduates from having kids or buying a home. Not all graduates succeed.

Student debt impacts society. According to Washington Post reporter Helaine Olen, student debt may increase economic inequality and hinder growth. High-debt college grads may spend less or start businesses. Growth and jobs may suffer.

Free colleges reduce debt and enhance growth. The Levy Economics Institute at Bard College estimated that eliminating US student debt would boost GDP by $108 billion (about $330 per person) and create 1.5 million jobs. Free college tuition may help low-income students attain better-paying jobs, benefitting the economy.

Society and borrowers are affected by student debt. Universal college decreases stress, enhances GDP, and confuses pupils.

Tax or finance disputes

Free college raises taxes, say opponents. Some say government shouldn't support education. Some say government shouldn't support education. Some say free college is too pricey.

However, tuition-free higher education advocates say the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. The Brookings Institution predicts that tuition-free public colleges and universities would cost $70 billion per year, or $220 per US person. Third of US defense spending or 1% of GDP.

Supporters believe the plan will increase economic growth and minimize social assistance needs, outweighing the expenditures. Georgetown University Center for Education and the Workforce estimates college graduates earn 84% more than high school graduates. This increased cash may fund the program through taxes.

Graduate debt decreases with free education. US student loan debt is at a record $1.7 trillion ($5,200 per person). Student debt affects graduates' finances, homebuying, and family-building, which influences the economy.

Military funding or wealth tax cuts for tuition-free higher education are desired. School efficiency may cut free costs. Cutting administration costs and using technology may help.

Free college education may increase economic production and reduce student debt, making it a profitable investment despite taxes and financial issues.

Free college discourages saving and working.

Free college discourages saving and working. Students cannot work or save for free college. This might devalue college degrees, hurting the economy.

Free college supporters disagree. Many kids save and work but cannot afford college. Free college lets students contribute to society and the economy without debt. Free education may encourage college graduates to work more because they earn more.

Financial security and long hours are not guaranteed by free college. Prevents student debt from limiting savings and investment. Free college may enhance post-graduation and the economy.

Free education may increase debt and access but decrease savings and employability. Politicians must cut college costs without discouraging effort or investment.

Human capital is increased by education, despite criticism.

While free college may discourage saving and earning, public education and human capital investment are essential. Education aids society. Public good: education. Several studies show that education improves creativity, economic progress, and social benefits.

Workers and money may avoid free higher education, but education is not the main reason. Saving and working help people attain objectives, assist families, and improve society. Income, quality of life, and economic advancement rise with education.

Conclusion: Public education beats savings and effort discouragement. Free college benefits society and gives everyone a chance.

Prove your counterargument.

Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce research supports education as a public good and human capital investment. According to the poll, 65% of jobs will require schooling by 2020. These data show how important higher education is to the economy and job market. The poll found that four-year college graduates earn far more than non-graduates. Earn health and retirement benefits by working harder.

Another Journal of Labor Economics study found free college benefits society. The Chilean low-income free higher education program was investigated. Taxed, educated, wealthy, and spending kids.

Research from College Board indicates that degrees have benefits beyond money. Wellness, civic engagement, economic success. College education for free.Public welfare and national human capital benefit from free or low-cost higher education, research shows.

References

Institutions should promote debt reduction and fair education. This essay argues that college should be chaotic for students. Debate surrounds student debt's social and economic effects and higher education's cost and accessibility. Manage grade inflation, lower standards, tax, budget, and discourage savings. Free college is unsustainable and expensive. Free colleges promoted equity, minimized graduate and community debt, and valued education as a public good and long-term human capital investment. All should have free higher education.

Key Refence

Should college be free? the economic impact of Free College. Research.com. (2023, June 28). https://research.com/universities-colleges/should-college-be-free

Perry, A. M., Andre M. Perry, C. R., Andre M. Perry, R. R., Andre M. Perry, C. R., Pam Harder, G. W., & Miller, C. (2022, March 9). Student loans, the Racial Wealth Divide, and why we need full student debt cancellation. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/student-loans-the-racial-wealth-divide-and-why-we-need-full-student-debt-cancellation/

CEW Georgetown. (n.d.). https://cew.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/College_ROI.pdf

Lumina issue papers - lumina foundation. (n.d.-b). https://www.luminafoundation.org/files/resources/its-not-just-the-money.pdf

Council on Foreign Relations. (n.d.). Is rising student debt harming the U.S. economy?. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-student-loan-debt-trends-economic-impact

Review education policies - education GPS. OECD. (n.d.). https://gpseducation.oecd.org/revieweducationpolicies/#!node=41761&filter=all