Can you please check to see if I'm answering this question correctly?

if not, is there anything I need to fix?

A: no, the Federal Government cannot instruct the High Court to reverse its decision. There are three branches of the doctrine of separation of powers - executive, judiciary and legislature. This doctrine has three organisational forms of governmental powers. One is, that the same person or party should never partially set up more than one of the three government branches. Another is that the branches should never interfere with one another. And lastly, the branch should never utilise the functions that were allocated to another branch. This is to avoid giving any branch an abusive power. Hence, ifthe federal government dictates the judiciary in what to do such as overturning it's decision then this would completely violate the doctrine of separation of powers. The legislature (also known as Parliament) debates and makes laws that everyone in australia must obey at all times. The executive, as known as the government, suggests new laws and pass them over to the Parliament. If the laws have passed, then the government implements these laws. The judiciary applies and interprets the law. This is also known as the Courts that were created at three levels - Federal, State and Territory. Thejudiciary makes sure that the courts make fair and neutral decisions without facing powers from those in government or under executive. The three branches of the government can happen to stop each other - lfthe Government suggests a law that the Parliament regards it as unacceptable and disgraceful. As a result, it's the Parliament's job to not let that law pass. However, if an unlawful or wrongful law is created by the Parliament then the Court can only choose to validate the matters that are only allowed by law or the Constitution, and invalidate the ones that are regarded unlawful for society