- can you Please help me with this exercise (questions)for me to understand more: Are human rights really universal ? (i.e., stating your own views on what you think about the question asked above, may also link the articles uploaded)

- All taking into account the criteria mentioned below: Analysis - Identification and communication of relevant theories/concepts from the course texts (and from texts other than those in this course) - Identification and communication of relevant facts Synthesis - Demonstration of deep, original, or personal thinking (i.e., stating your own views on what you think about the question asked above, may also link the text) - Formation of connections between theories/concepts - Clarity of references (Harvard style) - Clarity of bibliography

Machine Translated by Google usiness and Human Rights: towards a con hm Ruggle . Add to list RED20201 (No. 1), pages 128 19 130 Follow this review NOT We live in a disoriented world that cals imo at we may have them to weshall we may have taken for gra sectors after World War . But today, the EU is an economic and social s more than ever. The fact that Finland has chosen the Business & Human R effect on how to make the most progress effectively possible action at EU level marity as a whole and es & Human Fights principles. Thinking about Business & Human Rights principles try 2091 in Davis, Kofi Annan, than Secretary General of the him for in caves. Rail Annan, than Secretary General of the United Nation and Nations, addressed the World Economy in these toms: "If we cannot make globalization work for everyone, it will end up work bution of benefits and the imbalances in global ride making that characterize globeliza open giobal economy that has been so painstakingly butt over the past half century. globalization work for e benefits and evis generated by globalization, between nations as well as within them. The result is general resentment and a loss of confidence in institutions, whatever they may be. companies, business associations or even sports organisations. But this progress is insufficient and has only concemed in insufficient proportion of them. Next for governments, they are at the heart of the new social contracts that they must build for and with that pepeshots. This heroes ascent work and wages, equal pay for equal work, fostering social and economic inc enough to cushion the unforeseen shocks to the economy in general, and to pace, subway ne Firstly, for each of us, the Business & Human Rights principles constitues nothing more - but nothing less - than the anice of always being treated with respect. whatever their personal situation, and of being able to obtain redress A recent recognition aly adopting the Guiding Principles on Business pillars. Fist. there Is the duty of the state to protect insusing burainesese. Then stonerizes the burden on companies to corporate conduct. The DECD Gudsizes for Muth pillar, almost verbatim. peco Guselines for horse principles do not just for a text, they have been designed to contribute to creating a new regulatory ompension for the weaknesses of to each other and to play trustssly reinforcing seles to work towards a mere comprehensive and effective global system Strengthen the momentum wodmoment stweaks concepts: the promotion of a " smart mix of massures " and the soo ad -tuscan". for a "smart mix of measures "741 and iden. The first guiding principle requires States to have legislation capable of protecting the human rights that companies could endanger. The third Guiding Principle calls for the regular review of these measures and mair updating Guiding Principle 3 adds that States should periodically review the adequacy of these measures and update them westensure ed method legal areas such sis corrparty line or securities law. do not hinder would combine both soft jaw and hard law, but also national and international measures. what wid until now only guidance in the form of voluntary infatives companies. These include on topics such as modern slavery, the exploitation of minerals tom conflict zones and, more performance of companies, as well as on the due diligence reasonable in terms of human rights and CSR, too much discretion is often lett to the imagination of companies, consultancies and stakeste Hectve Implementation should be clarised more precisely, to avoid both the proliferation of standards and sell-define cortesoptions. Ninvertheless. the ascard of the seat pilar is in progress The game of leverage The Great Principles are based on a second kay stra of the Business & Human Rights principles in the EU in several ways. ach agency involved has its own particular objectives, that's for s putin all cases, they must take into account the with which they angage. whenever It occurs. This corporate ree ponsduty to uphold. But paren They should establish clear operational pos an. When the leverage effect on the partners is more limited, It is somet offering hearthes or by choosing other partners. char cameunits, inducing aspeters of goods and services within global valid charm. have was as me leverage they have over their subsklarles, contractors in relations. They should establish afluence is limited, it may be possible to increase it, for example by offering incentive h home and host states of multinations support such private inferrato As legaly responsible for any human rights harm an mstances of their incheerners. a natural incartive wit arise to distancing from entlies adopting difficulty for the States is to draw a fair balance in the legislation why of data provided by rating agencies, Common taxonomies and templates are set in the infancy and are cases and who can pay a high price for bad asia, as well as for companies string to morons the practices that go unrecognized. The problem is particularly serious in the "5" category, which deals with human rights has carveloped a comprehensive iness runsformative effect on global capital markets. short there are a wide variety of epport elationship between business and human rights. Conclusion Commission, the task hes large en entrusted to the Europe rusted to the European External Action Service, with Is and the objectives that should be achieved too narrow a prism & we consider the plurality of challenges that the olcy space, for the first time. Let it be the same at EU level shes as a single at the end of my term as Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Business and Human Rights, I proposed inding treaty on the Business & Human Pigter jason wehere & reman flights issue show that an international instrument is bots essential and desirable help level the playing field in a globalized world. whatare very cesar n and. Fromthe san. I expressed my doubts about the posslaity of dressing the entire relationship between business and human rights in a single treaty. In my view, this is far too con sensitive in area for such an undertaking to produce significant scouts The sak is that we wil only aching page whenthees for innovation Noting I have seen in the the years of nestssons wow towards even fewer of measures'. I hope that the Commission and Parliament will put the relationship between business and human rights at the heart of the forthcoming action. Ratings backlash and protectionism, And Base in turn, threaten to undermine fed utiningly unravel the cote world pogparty Economic Forum, Daven. 29 Jan 2001 . 'United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nasons Protect. Respect or Multinational Enterprises, May 25, 2011, On this question v. : https awww.she 1 2019 Global Sustainable In Adance, March 2018. Calm belo on 10/17/2022 SPrevious post NO. CNL