Question
Canada Adventures was a travel group conducting week-long bus trips across Canada. Canada Adventures and the Sure Stay Hotel Group entered into an agreement in
Canada Adventures was a travel group conducting week-long bus trips across Canada. Canada Adventures and the Sure Stay Hotel Group entered into an agreement in which Canada Adventures clients would exclusively stay in Sure Stay Hotels on their trips in exchange for a flat rate for the summer season. Sure Stay Hotel Group advised Canada Adventures that it had large hotels in Kamloops, Revelstoke, Banff, and Jasper and that the hotels would accommodate Canada Adventures' clients over the course of the summer. This statement was made at the time of the agreement when Sure Star Hotels did not have many bookings anywhere at its hotels in question. Canada Adventures paid the fee for the summer at the start of the season, but it did not specify the number of clients it would carry. On Canada Adventures' first trip of the summer, they attempted to check their clients into the Sure Stay Hotel in Revelstoke. They were told that the hotel was not big enough to accommodate all twenty of Canada Adventures' clients, as it had only fifteen rooms. Canada Adventures had to lodge a large number of its clients at different hotels in Revelstoke at a significant expense. Canada Adventures seeks to recoup the cost of the additional hotel rooms from Sure Stay Hotel.
- What is the main legal issue in this case (2 marks)
- What is the legal test that would be used by a court in deciding that legal issue? (1 mark)
- an argument for the plaintiff. (1 mark)
- an argument for the defendant (1 mark)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started