Carla Reddy is suing the Tesla Motor Company for the wrongful death of her husband Robert, who died when his 2016 Tesla S Sedan left the road and collided with a tree.Carla contends that the accident was the result of a failure in the autonomous driving feature of the vehicle, attributable to a manufacturer's design defect.Tesla contends that Mr. Reddy was driving under the influence of alcohol at the time of the accident and improperly navigated a turn in the road, over-riding the autonomous navigation features of the vehicle.

The following transcript presents excerpts from the direct and cross-examination of Carla Reddy and direct examination of Deputy Patrick Allen.Applying the Florida Rules of Evidence, indicate for each set of numbered linesany objections that should have been madeconsidering both the question and answer given.Explainthe grounds for the objections,any argument that might be appropriate by opposing counsel, and the probable ruling of the trial judge. If you believe no objection should have been raised indicate why you believe the question and answer were proper.

1. On the night of the accident, do you know where Robert had been? He had been on a business trip to Orlando, He called around 7 pm and said he would be late because he was stopping to visit his mother at the nursing home. He siad he would stop for a bite to eat while on the road.
2. Cross examination of carla reddy: This was not the first time that Mr. Reddy drove his car off the road, was it? No, he had a small accident in 2000 and a bad one in 1997.
3. The bad accident was when he fell asleep at the wheel and hit a child on a bicycle. Yes, he had been driving straight home from a business trip in New Orleans, thankfully the child was not seriously injured.
4. Wasn't he charged with driving under the influence for that accident? That charge was dropped in a plea bargain when he pled guilty to reckless driving.
5. When Mr. Reddy called you to tell you he was coming home late, did he sound tired to you? Not really.