Carter, at age 20, paid $500 down and bought a car from A-1 Motors for $5,000. In the bill of sale, Carter certified that he was "21 years of age or older," (and thus of majority in this jurisdiction). In fact, he told the salesperson he was 22. Carter took the car home but brought it back the next day for repairs. When A-1 failed to correct the problems, Carter had his attorney write the company to repudiate the contract and to demand the return of the down payment. Should Carter prevail? What if Carter had kept the car for 18 months before he had tried to repudiate the contract? Would your answer differ? Don't forget the Infancy Doctrine

Assume further that the owner of A-1 Motors (A-1) had hired a painter to paint the showroom for an agreed-on-rate of $15 per hour plus materials. The printer finished the job and presented A-1 with a bill for $2,000. The owner of A-1 contended that the job was worth only $1,000. After protracted negotiations, the painter agreed to settle for $1,700. The owner then wrote a $1,700 check, on the back of which he wrote "payment in full." The painter cashed the check but subsequently sued A-1 in small claims court for $300. Who would win and why Remember, this is a two part question