Case 1: Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLC, 60 Cal. 4th 474, 177 Cal. Rptr. 3d 539, 333 P.3d 723 (2014) and Case 2: Executive Home Care Franchising, LLC v. Marshall Health Corp., 642 Fed.Appx. 181 (3d Cir. 2016) Compare the two cases of the franchise business and legal issues, including comments on the parties being sued, the parties filing suit, the financial damages in each case (distinguish between actual and potential damages if needed), and the ability of the alleged infringing party to make financial restitution. Summarize each case in your own words.

Use the IRAC structure to identify issues and apply law and facts to the case.

Identify the issue. 2. Relevant law - This could be sections/s of the Corporations Act or case law. 3. Application to the facts - the law is applied to the facts of the problem. 4. Conclusion

What have the cases and this course taught you about franchising and small businesses in relation to business law?