Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Case 14-04 Spartan Casino On January 1, 2015, Spartan Casino, a public business entity (Spartan or the Company), executed a $250 million revolving credit facility

Case 14-04 Spartan Casino On January 1, 2015, Spartan Casino, a public business entity (Spartan or the Company), executed a $250 million revolving credit facility with Uber Bank AG (Uber). The rate of interest on the credit facility is USD LIBOR + 650 basis points (bps) for the first two years. Spartan has a choice of 1M-, 3M-, and 6M-USD LIBOR each time it draws down on the credit facility. Interest payments on the borrowing are settled on the basis of the LIBOR tenor selected (e.g., if Spartan selects three-month USD LIBOR as the referenced rate, interest is due every three months on that borrowing). Principal borrowed is typically due five years from the drawdown date, but each drawdown will contain a specified maturity date. Upon finalizing the terms of the credit facility, Spartan immediately drew down $50 million on January 1, 2015, at 3M-USD-LIBOR + 650 bps, due on December 31, 2019. Spartans interest rate risk management policy requires that at least 75 percent of its outstanding debt be fixed rate (either directly or indirectly through the use of derivatives). In order to maintain compliance with its policy, Spartan entered into an interest rate swap to convert the borrowing from variable to fixed interest. The Company designated the interest rate swap as a hedge of forecasted interest payments associated with changes in 3M-USD-LIBOR on the first previously unhedged $50 million of 3M-USD-LIBOR based debt. The Company has no other debt. Specifically, Spartan executed the following interest rate swap transaction: Interest Rate Swap 1: Notional amount: Trade date: Effective date: Maturity date: Pay leg: Receive leg: Initial LIBOR: Payment dates: Variable reset dates: $50 million January 1, 2015 January 1, 2015 December 31, 2019 8.0 percent 3M-USD-LIBOR + 650 bps 1.00 percent Each March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 Quarterly, each March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 Six months later, on July 1, 2015, Spartan needed to again raise capital to continue construction on its new City Focus hotel and high-end retail development. The Company Case 14-04c: Spartan Casino Page 2 borrowed another $75 million at 3M-USD-LIBOR + 650 bps, due on June 30, 2020. Similar to the first drawdown, Spartan executed a second interest rate swap with the following terms: Interest Rate Swap 2: Notional amount: Trade date: Effective date: Maturity date: Pay leg: Receive leg: Initial LIBOR: Payment dates: Variable reset dates: $75 million July 1, 2015 July 1, 2015 June 30, 2020 8.5 percent 3M-USD-LIBOR + 650 bps 1.25 percent Each September 30, December 31, March 31, and June 30 Quarterly, each September 30, December 31, March 31, and June 30 Spartan designated this interest rate swap as a hedge of forecasted interest payments associated with changes in 3M-USD-LIBOR on the first previously unhedged $75 million of 3M-USD-LIBOR based debt. After two years, Spartan continues to pay interest on the $125 million borrowings on time, in addition to settling the interest rate swap each quarter. However, on December 31, 2016, Spartan decides to pay $25 million of the $125 million it has borrowed from Uber to date. The debt is prepayable without penalty. The Company makes no other changes to its capital structure of derivatives. Required: 1. Define the type of hedge that Spartan would need to designate. In other words, are these cash flow hedges, fair value hedges, or net investment hedges? 2. Identify the criteria that Spartan would need to meet and document to ensure the interest rate swaps achieve hedge accounting that is based on the provisions of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging Activities. Copyright 2013 Deloitte Development LLC All Rights Reserved. Case 14-04c: Spartan Casino Page 3 3. Determine the appropriate journal entries to account for the two hedging relationships for the year ended December 31, 2015. Use the details below to aid in entry determination, and assume that both hedging relationships are perfectly effective. Date 3M-USD-LIBOR Swap 1 Fair Value* Swap 2 Fair Value* March 31, 2015 1.00% (reset 12/31) $250,000 n/a June 30, 2015 1.10% (reset 03/31) $750,000 n/a September 30, 2015 1.25% (reset 06/30) $1,200,000 $900,000 December 31, 2015 1.18% (reset 09/30) $1,100,000 $775,000 * Note that the fair values are after the quarterly settlements are made. 4. Briefly describe the implications of Spartan paying down $25 million of the $125 million total borrowing on the two hedging relationships.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Business Analysis And Valuation Using Financial Statements Text And Cases

Authors: Krishna G. Palepu, Paul M. Healy, Victor Lewis Bernard, W.Gordon Filby

2nd Edition

0324015658, 9780324015652

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

What are your current research studies?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Describe five organizational development techniques.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Explain the two dimensions of an organizations culture.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

State why people resist change and how to overcome resistance.

Answered: 1 week ago