Case #3 Taking Risk as Providers Total Joint Case Rate

Your local BC/BS plan has experienced high costs and unpredictable cost increases for total joint replacement cases in recent years. They have approached three competing hospital systems about taking a case rate for total knee replacements. The case rate will cover all diagnostic work, the surgery itself and all rehabilitation needed to get the patient back to full functionality. Last year, BC/BS paid for 1000 total knee replacements in this region, and they project the same volume next year. The working assumption here is that the winning bidder will get 100% of that volume next year.

The current breakdown of BC/BS business at these three facilities is as follows:

In addition to the hospital cost for these procedures, you can assume that BC/BS has also paid the following on average per case:

- Diagnostics (all) - $1,000

- Professional (all) - $2,000

- 30% of patients will require post-acute care at a rehab. facility at a cost of $15,000/case

- 70% of patients will go home with home care and other follow-up at a cost of $1,000/case

Case Questions:

A. Assuming that the cost/case figures above remain constant, what would be the minimum that each system could bid to garner the BC/BS business such that its costs would be covered (i.e., this would not be a money losing venture). What happens to each hospitals total profit if the winning bidder is awarded 100% of the volume?

	Mercy	St. Sebastian	University
Total Knee Procedures/ year	500	350	150
Current BC/BS hospital reimbursement/case	$22,000	$21,000	$24,500
Allocated overhead cost/case	$7,500	$8,500	$9,000
Implantable device cost/case	$5,000	$5,000	$4,500
Other variable costs/case	$2,500	$2,400	$2,300

B. The economic term, contribution represents the portion of sales revenue that is not consumed by

variable costs and so contributes to the coverage of fixed costs. As an example, a movie ticket costs

$10, and we determine that $2 of that goes to variable cost coverage, $6 to fixed cost coverage and

$2 to profit. $8, then, would be the contribution towards coverage of non-variable costs. Using the

notion of contribution, is there a case to be made for one or more of the hospitals to lower their

offered price to a level at which theyd receive negative total margin? Thinking in terms of marginal

volume gained, what is the lowest each hospital could bid in this scenario?

C. Suppose that a new entrant comes late to the bidding process, and plans a super competitive bid of

$13,900 per case. This is a new orthopedic institute that is made up of several orthopedic surgical

groups. They have their own diagnostic facilities and can bring all of the rehabilitation assets that

theyll need. They also have a direct relationship with a device manufacturer and believe they can

cut the cost of devices used down to $2,500 per case. They only thing they lack are the actual

surgical facilities. They offer to lease OR time from each of the hospitals at $2,400 per case. Are the

hospitals likely to accept that offer? What happens to the economic profit of each hospital if they

do/ do not accept the offer?