Case 3.2: Battling Over Bottled Water. Nestl holds a 99-year lease for the land that the Sanctuary Spring sits on. While lease-holders are generally understood to be able to make full use of their land, when public resources are involved, they are limited to "reasonable uses." How would you support or challenge this distinction? what are the key ways in which benefits and burdens are being distributed between Nestl and the community in this case.