Question
CASE 48 Economic Consequences The FASB has issued SFAS No. 106, Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions (see FASB ASC 715), and SFAS
CASE 48 Economic Consequences
The FASB has issued SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions" (see FASB ASC 715), and SFAS No. 112, "Employers' Accounting for Postemployment Benefits" (see FASB ASC 712). These pronouncements required companies to change from accounting for benefits, such as health care, that are paid to former employees during retirement on a payasyougo basis to recognizing the expected cost of benefits during employment. As a result, companies must accrue and report expenses today, thereby reducing income and increasing liabilities. Some have argued that these pronouncements will cause employers to reduce or eliminate postretirement and postemployment benefits. It is not necessary for you to know the particulars of implementing either of these standards to address the issues described here.
Required:
Should financial reporting requirements affect management's decisionmaking process? Discuss.
Should management reduce or eliminate postretirement or postemployment benefits simply because of the new pronouncement? Discuss.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started