CASE 832 Evaluating a Companys Budget Procedures from Garrison et al textbook.

This is the second of three assignments that make up the Comprehensive Project grade.

This assignment assesses your ability to budgeting procedures analysis in a real-life type of scenario. For this problem, write a 500 word evaluation to

1. Identify the problems that appear to exist in Ferguson & Son Manufacturing Companys budgetary control system and explain how the problems are likely to reduce the effectiveness of the system.

2. Explain how Ferguson & Son Manufacturing Companys budgetary control system could be revised to improve its effectiveness.

The paper must be grammatically correct and use proper APA format.

Although the assignment is due by November 20, it would be advantageous to complete the assignment shortly after completing Module 3 while budgetary analysis is still fresh in mind

This topic partially fulfills the requirements of the following course learning outcome:

• Learning Outcome 3 -- Perform decision and performance analysis using cost-volume-profit, budgeting, and standard costing techniques.

Case Study 8-32 Evaluating a Company's Budget Procedures

Tom Emory and Jim Morris strolled back to their plant from the administrative offices of Ferguson & Son Manufacturing Company. Tom is manager of the machine shop in the companys factory; Jim is manager of the equipment maintenance department.

The men had just attended the monthly performance evaluation meeting for plant department heads. These meetings had been held on the third Tuesday of each month since Robert Ferguson, Jr., the presidents son, had become plant manager a year earlier.

As they were walking, Tom Emory spoke: Boy, I hate those meetings! I never know whether my departments accounting reports will show good or bad performance. Im beginning to expect the worst. If the accountants say I saved the company a dollar, Im called Sir, but if I spend even a little too muchboy, do I get in trouble. I dont know if I can hold on until I retire.

Tom had just been given the worst evaluation he had ever received in his long career with Ferguson & Son. He was the most respected of the experienced machinists in the company. He had been with Ferguson & Son for many years and was promoted to supervisor of the machine shop when the company expanded and moved to its present location. The president (Robert Ferguson, Sr.) had often stated that the companys success was due to the high-quality work of machinists like Tom. As supervisor, Tom stressed the importance of craftsmanship and told his workers that he wanted no sloppy work coming from his department.

When Robert Ferguson, Jr., became the plant manager, he directed that monthly performance comparisons be made between actual and budgeted costs for each department. The departmental budgets were intended to encourage the supervisors to reduce inefficiencies and to seek cost reduction opportunities. The company controller was instructed to have his staff tighten the budget slightly whenever a department attained its budget in a given month; this was done to reinforce the plant managers desire to reduce costs. The young plant manager often stressed the importance of continued progress toward attaining the budget; he also made it known that he kept a file of these performance reports for future reference when he succeeded his father.

Tom Emorys conversation with Jim Morris continued as follows:

Emory:I really dont understand. Weve worked so hard to meet the budget, and the minute we do so they tighten it on us. We cant work any faster and still maintain quality. I think my men are ready to quit trying. Besides, those reports dont tell the whole story. We always seem to be interrupting the big jobs for all those small rush orders. All that setup and machine adjustment time is killing us. And quite frankly, Jim, you were no help. When our hydraulic press broke down last month, your people were nowhere to be found. We had to take it apart ourselves and got stuck with all that idle time.

Morris:Im sorry about that, Tom, but you know my department has had trouble making budget, too. We were running well behind at the time of that problem, and if wed spent a day on that old machine, we would never have made it up. Instead we made the scheduled inspections of the forklift trucks because we knew we could do those in less than the budgeted time.

Emory:Well, Jim, at least you have some options. Im locked into what the scheduling department assigns to me and you know theyre being harassed by sales for those special orders. Incidentally, why didnt your report show all the supplies you guys wasted last month when you were working in Bills department?

Morris:Were not out of the woods on that deal yet. We charged the maximum we could to other work and havent even reported some of it yet.

Emory:Well, Im glad you have a way of getting out of the pressure. The accountants seem to know everything thats happening in my department, sometimes even before I do. I thought all that budget and accounting stuff was supposed to help, but it just gets me into trouble. Its all a big pain. Im trying to put out quality work; theyre trying to save pennies.

Paper follows the 20.0 pts 16.0 pts 12.0 pts 8.0 pts guidelines and Exceptional - Paper focuses on Progressing-Does not fully Achieving - Mostly on Developing-MIsses the covers all of the the topic and does not stray from topic Some minor support the topic. A few vague point completely. No requirements of the camparisions were made and the central theme. Great insight variance of theme. Good comparison were made; mostly on assignment no substance. Relied on just using strong comparisons and comparisons of style. Uses course concepts leader and not the other. Little course concepts. insight Into couse concepts. restating the question. well. Topic supports the 20.0 pts 16.0 pts 12.0 pts 8.0 pts required amount of reliable research Progressing-Does not include the Exceptional - Exceeds the minimum Achieving -Meets the Developing -Little or no number of research sources. All. minimum number of required number of reliable sources research or none of the using proper APA sources all of which are sources are highly reliable, include or the sources used are not deemed sources used are of format acceptable quality. Poor some Peer Review articles. APA is reliable and credible. to be acceptable. APA needs APA is mostly good. improvement excellent APA or none at all. Paper ties in course 20.0 pts 16.0 pts 12.0 pts 8.0 pts concepts. Uses Progressing -Uses at least 1 Exceptional - Uses at least 3 course Achieving-Uses at least 2 course Developing information concepts which are clearly identifiably as being part of the Course concepts concepts which are clearly course concept which are clearly presented in class identifiably as being part of the identifably as being part of the are not exhibited and/or in the curcullum in the paper, curriculum curriculum. textbook Student identifies 20.0 pts 16.0 pts 12.0 pts 8.0 pts the real problem in Achieving-Identifies a Exceptional Identifies a major issue and at Progressing -Eludes to the major Developing- Does the case and least one minor issue. Proposes workable issue but does not clearly identify it. not identily the major issue and proposes solutions solutions for both Proposes no solution. major issue. suggests a solution. to solve the problem. Writing quality 20.0 pts 16.0 pts 12.0 pts 8.0 pts Developing -Poorly Progressing-Weak Exceptional - Very well written and Achieving - Well written and well organized . Identifies and written and poorly somewhat organized. Most of the organization. Some spelling important points are addressed. No spelling or grammar errors. organized. Many spelling and grammar and/or grammar errors. emphasizes all important points. No spelling or grammar errors. Missed some important points. errors. Paper follows the 20.0 pts 16.0 pts 12.0 pts 8.0 pts guidelines and Exceptional - Paper focuses on Progressing-Does not fully Achieving - Mostly on Developing-MIsses the covers all of the the topic and does not stray from topic Some minor support the topic. A few vague point completely. No requirements of the camparisions were made and the central theme. Great insight variance of theme. Good comparison were made; mostly on assignment no substance. Relied on just using strong comparisons and comparisons of style. Uses course concepts leader and not the other. Little course concepts. insight Into couse concepts. restating the question. well. Topic supports the 20.0 pts 16.0 pts 12.0 pts 8.0 pts required amount of reliable research Progressing-Does not include the Exceptional - Exceeds the minimum Achieving -Meets the Developing -Little or no number of research sources. All. minimum number of required number of reliable sources research or none of the using proper APA sources all of which are sources are highly reliable, include or the sources used are not deemed sources used are of format acceptable quality. Poor some Peer Review articles. APA is reliable and credible. to be acceptable. APA needs APA is mostly good. improvement excellent APA or none at all. Paper ties in course 20.0 pts 16.0 pts 12.0 pts 8.0 pts concepts. Uses Progressing -Uses at least 1 Exceptional - Uses at least 3 course Achieving-Uses at least 2 course Developing information concepts which are clearly identifiably as being part of the Course concepts concepts which are clearly course concept which are clearly presented in class identifiably as being part of the identifably as being part of the are not exhibited and/or in the curcullum in the paper, curriculum curriculum. textbook Student identifies 20.0 pts 16.0 pts 12.0 pts 8.0 pts the real problem in Achieving-Identifies a Exceptional Identifies a major issue and at Progressing -Eludes to the major Developing- Does the case and least one minor issue. Proposes workable issue but does not clearly identify it. not identily the major issue and proposes solutions solutions for both Proposes no solution. major issue. suggests a solution. to solve the problem. Writing quality 20.0 pts 16.0 pts 12.0 pts 8.0 pts Developing -Poorly Progressing-Weak Exceptional - Very well written and Achieving - Well written and well organized . Identifies and written and poorly somewhat organized. Most of the organization. Some spelling important points are addressed. No spelling or grammar errors. organized. Many spelling and grammar and/or grammar errors. emphasizes all important points. No spelling or grammar errors. Missed some important points. errors