CASE ANALYSIS 1: BOOM AND BUST IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS In 1997 Michael O'Dell, the chief scientist at...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/05/6644703a8e827_2106644703a5904c.jpg)
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/05/6644703b6b28b_2116644703b486ac.jpg)
Transcribed Image Text:
CASE ANALYSIS 1: BOOM AND BUST IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS In 1997 Michael O'Dell, the chief scientist at WorldCom, which owned the largest network of "Internet backbone" fiber optic cable in the world, stated that data traffic over the Internet was doubling every hundred days. This implied a growth rate of over 1,000 percent a year. O'Dell went on to say that there was not enough fiber optic capacity to go around, and that "demand will far outstrip supply for the foreseeable future." Electrified by this potential opportunity, a number of companies rushed into the business. These firms included Level 3 Communications, 360 Networks, Global Crossing, Qwest Communications, WorldCom, Williams Communications Group, Genuity Inc., and XO Communications. In all cases the strategic plans were remarkably similar: Raise lots of capital, build massive fiber optic networks that straddled the nation (or even the globe), cut prices, and get ready for the rush of business. Managers at these companies believed that surging demand would soon catch up with capacity. resulting in a profit bonanza for those that had the foresight to build out their networks. It was a gold rush, and the first into the field would stake the best claims. However, there were dissenting voices. As early as October 1998 an Internet researcher at AT&T Labs named Andrew Odlyzko published a paper that debunked the assumption that demand for Internet traffic was growing at 1,000 percent a year. Odlyzko's careful analysis concluded that growth was much slower-only 100 percent a year! Although still large, that growth rate was not nearly large enough to fill the massive flood of fiber optic capacity that was entering the market. Moreover, Odlyzko noted that new technologies were increasing the amount of data that could be sent down existing fibers, reducing the need for new fiber. But with investment money flooding into the market, few paid any attention to him. World Com was still using the 1,000 percent figure as late as September 2000. As it turned out, Odlyzko was right. Capacity rapidly outstripped demand, and by late 2002 less than 3 percent of the fiber that had been laid in the ground was actually being used! While prices slumped, the surge in volume that managers had bet on did not materialize. Unable to service the debt they had taken on to build out their networks, company after company tumbled into bankruptcyincluding WorldCom, 360 Networks, XO Communications, and Global Crossing. Level 3 and Qwest survived, but their stock prices had fallen by 90 percent, and both companies were saddled with massive debts. Case Discussion Questions 1. Why did the strategic plans adopted by companies like Level 3, Global Crossing, and 360 Networks fail? 2. The managers who ran these companies were smart, successful individuals, as were many of the investors who put money into these businesses. How could so many smart people have been so wrong? 3. What specific decision-making biases do you think were at work in this industry during the late 1990s and early 2000s? 4. What could the managers running these companies have done differently that might have led to a different outcome? 5. Do you think the firm is living up to its mission, vision, values, and goals? What evidence do you have to support your conclusion? 6. Can you find any evidence that managers at the organization might have made any significant strategic errors over the last decade? If they have, what role did poor planning, a lack of planning, or decision-making traps play in these errors? CASE ANALYSIS 1: BOOM AND BUST IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS In 1997 Michael O'Dell, the chief scientist at WorldCom, which owned the largest network of "Internet backbone" fiber optic cable in the world, stated that data traffic over the Internet was doubling every hundred days. This implied a growth rate of over 1,000 percent a year. O'Dell went on to say that there was not enough fiber optic capacity to go around, and that "demand will far outstrip supply for the foreseeable future." Electrified by this potential opportunity, a number of companies rushed into the business. These firms included Level 3 Communications, 360 Networks, Global Crossing, Qwest Communications, WorldCom, Williams Communications Group, Genuity Inc., and XO Communications. In all cases the strategic plans were remarkably similar: Raise lots of capital, build massive fiber optic networks that straddled the nation (or even the globe), cut prices, and get ready for the rush of business. Managers at these companies believed that surging demand would soon catch up with capacity. resulting in a profit bonanza for those that had the foresight to build out their networks. It was a gold rush, and the first into the field would stake the best claims. However, there were dissenting voices. As early as October 1998 an Internet researcher at AT&T Labs named Andrew Odlyzko published a paper that debunked the assumption that demand for Internet traffic was growing at 1,000 percent a year. Odlyzko's careful analysis concluded that growth was much slower-only 100 percent a year! Although still large, that growth rate was not nearly large enough to fill the massive flood of fiber optic capacity that was entering the market. Moreover, Odlyzko noted that new technologies were increasing the amount of data that could be sent down existing fibers, reducing the need for new fiber. But with investment money flooding into the market, few paid any attention to him. World Com was still using the 1,000 percent figure as late as September 2000. As it turned out, Odlyzko was right. Capacity rapidly outstripped demand, and by late 2002 less than 3 percent of the fiber that had been laid in the ground was actually being used! While prices slumped, the surge in volume that managers had bet on did not materialize. Unable to service the debt they had taken on to build out their networks, company after company tumbled into bankruptcyincluding WorldCom, 360 Networks, XO Communications, and Global Crossing. Level 3 and Qwest survived, but their stock prices had fallen by 90 percent, and both companies were saddled with massive debts. Case Discussion Questions 1. Why did the strategic plans adopted by companies like Level 3, Global Crossing, and 360 Networks fail? 2. The managers who ran these companies were smart, successful individuals, as were many of the investors who put money into these businesses. How could so many smart people have been so wrong? 3. What specific decision-making biases do you think were at work in this industry during the late 1990s and early 2000s? 4. What could the managers running these companies have done differently that might have led to a different outcome? 5. Do you think the firm is living up to its mission, vision, values, and goals? What evidence do you have to support your conclusion? 6. Can you find any evidence that managers at the organization might have made any significant strategic errors over the last decade? If they have, what role did poor planning, a lack of planning, or decision-making traps play in these errors?
Expert Answer:
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these general management questions
-
1 . Briefly discuss the concept of "business/financial valuation" along with its importance in financial decision-making. 2. The state lottery claims that its grand prize is $1 million. The lucky...
-
Northern Virginia Community College HOW MUCH FINANCIAL RISK SHOULD YOU TAKE? Mark D. D'Antonio Nova Southeastern University FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA, U.S.A. Abstract A successful retirement...
-
In the ZZZZ Best case, explain the kinds of evidence that the auditors gathered and how the auditors failed. just write one or two paragraph to support ZZZZ Best Case On May 19, 1987, a short article...
-
The following selected accounts and their current balances appear in the ledger of Clairemont Co. for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2018: Instructions 1. Prepare a multiple-step income statement. 2....
-
(a) Make a line chart for JetBlue's revenue. (b) Describe the trend (if any) and discuss possible causes. (c) Fit both a linear and an exponential trend to the data. (d) Which model is preferred?...
-
All sales of Tracys Jeans and Uniforms (TJU) are made on credit. Sales are billed twice monthly, on the fifth of the month for the last half of the prior months sales and on the twentieth of the...
-
State the considerations involved in creating a cost accounting information system.LO6
-
The October 31 bank statement of Whites Healthcare has just arrived from State Bank. To prepare the bank reconciliation, you gather the following data: a. The October 31 bank balance is $5,170. b....
-
If in the opinion of a given investor a stocks expected return exceeds its required return, this suggests that the investor thinks the stock is experiencing supernormal growth. the stock should be...
-
A Canadian corporation (ACC) has just entered into a two-year currency swap contract with Big Dealer Bank (BDB). The swap contract requires ACC to make semi-annual payments in Canadian dollars (C$)...
-
The Brownstone Corporation's bonds have 6 years remaining to maturity. Interest is paid annually, the bonds have a $1,000 par value, and the coupon interest rate is 10%. 1. What is the yield to...
-
Amflor Manufacturing Company's budget for the coming year revealed the following unit data: Budgeted Net Income for the year P 875,000 Unit costs: Manufacturing Cost Selling Cost General Cost Unit...
-
Brianna's Boutique has the following transactions related to its top-selling Gucci purse for the month of October. Brianna's Boutique uses a periodic inventory system. Date October 1 Transactions...
-
Question 1 Find the (indicated) first partial derivatives. a) f(x,t)=xInt b) f(x,y)=x" c) f(x, y) = [cos(t)dt y d) u = xysin '(yz) c) u= x f) u= = x + x + ... + x g) f(x,y) = ln(x+x + y); , (3,4) h)...
-
Consider the following function. g(x) = x/3 (a) If a 0, find g'(a). g'(a) =
-
leadership is a completely different ( social and professional) experience for woman Why? Explain the pipeline argument regarding women's advancement to leadership positions is it a valid and useful...
-
Estimate a range for the optimal objective value for the following LPs: (a) Minimize z = 5x1 + 2x2 Subject to X1 - x2 3 2x1 + 3x2 5 X1, x2 0 (b) Maximize z = x1 + 5x2 + 3x3 Subject to X1 + 2x2 +...
-
The following accounts appear in the ledger of The Shirer P.0.1,2,4,5 Company on January 31, the end of this fiscal year: The data needed for adjustments on January 31 are as follows; a-b....
-
Here is the partial work sheet for Olsen Mountain Shop Instructions 1. Prepare a statement of owners equity (no additional investment). 2. Prepare a balance sheet. 3. Determine the amount of the...
-
The following partial work sheet covers the affairs of Komo and Company for the year ending June 30: Instructions Check Figure . . Reversing entry amount, $852 1. Journalize the seven adjusting...
![Mobile App Logo](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/mobile/finalLogo.png)
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App