Case:

Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia (1989) SCR 143

-What were the social and historical forces that created the legal situation that was changed by this case?

-What legal theories do you think underlay the laws preceding this case?

-What changes in society and in jurisprudence led to the decision in this case?

-Did this case lag behind or run ahead of social change? What evidence do you have for that decision?

-What were the main arguments of the majority in this case? Was there a dissent, and what was its key concept?

-How has Canadian society changed because of this case?

-What effect has this case had on other laws?

-What is your overall opinion of this case?