CASE BRIEF ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS:

Please download the following case decision, Anderson v Henry, 2012 HRTO 213, from CanLII (canlii.org). Please read the case decision and complete a written summary of the key elements of the decision based on the OJEN case brief template. See the course page for the OJEN case document, which you should review in full prior to completing the assignment.

Your summary of the element of the case should be broken down as follows:

1. Who was involved in the case [case name and citation]

2. What happened in the case? [facts]

3. Which courts or decision-makers have heard the case already? [procedural history]

4. What are the legal issues the Tribunal must decide? [issues]

5. How did the Tribunal decide the case? [decision]

6. What legal principle does this decision stand for? [the ratio]

7. What explanation did the Tribunal give for its decision? [reasons]

Please ensure that your case brief is no more than 3-pages-long, double-spaced, 12 point font, Times New Roman. Please USE YOUR OWN WORDS THROUGHOUT THE BRIEF. Do not quote from the Tribunal's reasons for decision.

Please use the topics identified in the square brackets for each question, above, as the sub-titles for each section of your brief. For example, the first section of your brief should be named "case name and citation". For this assignment, legal citations are not required to be used. However, if you choose to use them, please ensure they conform to the Uniform Legal Citation Style ("McGill Guide").

Please submit your assignment to the Research Assignment #2 Dropbox that has been set up on e-Centennial for this submission. Please ensure that you use the within TBS assignment cover page as the cover page for the assignment submission and that you indicate your correct section number, student name, and student number.

This assignment is due on March 31, 2023 (end of Week 11). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to email me your inquiry at <..1@my.centennialcollege.ca.