Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Case: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8784864806968882344&q Explain the following statements from the case: 1. Wood Care argues the trial court improperly considered parol evidence in its interpretation of the

Case: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8784864806968882344&q

Explain the following statements from the case:

1. Wood Care argues the trial court improperly considered parol evidence in its interpretation of the Agreement and that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court's conclusion that Evangel Temple did not breach the Agreement. We affirm. (Note, you must give a definition of parol evidence in your explanation.) 2. The Agreement contained a "ten-percent termination clause" that stated:Tenant, however, shall have the option of terminating this lease at any time by giving Landlord written notice of its election to do so and payment to Landlord of a sum of money equal to 10% of the balance of the rental payments then owed under the terms of this lease.The Agreement also contained a "tax-exemption termination clause" that stated:Both parties agree to cooperate with each other to achieve any available property tax exemption. In the event a property tax exemption for the leased premises is denied or suspended, Tenant shall have the option to terminate this lease. If, notwithstanding, the denial of such property tax exemption, Tenant elects to continue the lease, then Tenant shall be responsible for the payment of all property taxes and assessments and shall timely pay such taxes or assessments.

3. Lack of clarity or a disagreement among the parties does not necessarily crt n ambiguity. Rather, whether "a contract is ambiguous is a question of law that must be decided by examining the contract as a whole in light of the circumstances present when the contract was entered." "If, after the pertinent rules of construction are applied, the contract can be given a definite or certain legal meaning, it is unambiguous and we construe it as a matter of law." 4. Who won and why.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Human Rights Between Law And Politics

Authors: Petr Agha

1st Edition

1509935738, 978-1509935734

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

What is the general problem with static scoping?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

How can sensitivity to pain be altered?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Do not go, wait until I come

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Pay him, do not wait until I sign

Answered: 1 week ago