Case question #2 on page 238. Anglin v. Berry 912 S.W.2d 633, App., Mo. (1995). The case questions involve actual cases, so google those cases and the citations given in the text and read about the actual case. It will help in answering the question. This case has to do with contract avoidance because the Plaintiff claims there was no "meeting of the mind" with regard to the contract. 1) summarize the issues in this case, and; 2) explain how the court held in this case and why the court held as it did.

2. Barry hired Anglin to produce engineering drawings for work Barry was doing at a brewery. Anglin said it would charge "street" rates for the work, which meant $35 an hour for regular work, $40 an hour for overtime work, and $45 an hour for its time. Barry gave Anglin a "purchase order" for the work, but no rate was specified. Barry paid bills for two months. Barry insisted that the work be done, but constantly complained about the rates and did not pay bills for four months. Anglin sued for $98,618, the amount it was due for work at the "street" rate. Barry claimed there was no contract, because there was no meeting 6 of the minds about the rate to be paid. Who prevails? [Anglin v. Barry, 912 S.W.2d 633, Ct. App., Mo. (1995) ]